Get PJ Media on your Apple

PJM Lifestyle

President Obama, Would You Send a Drone to Cuba to Kill the Weathermen?

Which way is the wind blowing today in Bill Ayers' neighborhood?

Paula Bolyard


February 11, 2013 - 7:00 am

It’s rather fascinating to compare members of the Weathermen to Anwar al-Awlaki, the American citizen-turned-terrorist who is the subject of the leaked white paper defining the parameters for drone strikes against American citizens abroad. The Washington Post reports:

The U.S.-born Muslim cleric played key roles in the Fort Hood, Tex., shooting rampage in 2009 that killed 13 people, as well as last year’s foiled attempt to put bombs on cargo planes bound to the United States. His words led a young Nigerian to attempt to blow up a jetliner over Detroit, and inspired an unemployed Pakistani man to drive a bomb-laden vehicle into the heart of New York’s Times Square. … So effective was his message that the CIA last year put him on the agency’s official target list, making him the first American citizen to be designated for death, wherever he could be found, without judicial process.

The CIA targeted Awlaki and in 2011 he was killed by a drone strike in Yemen. The DOJ white paper defended such targeted killings of U.S. citizens, asserting

the inherent right of the United States to national self defense under international law, Congress’s authorization of the use of all necessary and appropriate military force against this enemy, and the existence of an armed conflict with al-Qa’ida under international law.

The paper laid out a three-part test for killing a U.S. citizen who is “an operational leader continually planning attacks against U.S. persons and interests” and who is outside the United States:

(1) A high-level official of the U.S. government must determine that the targeted individual poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States;

(2) A capture operation would be infeasible–and those conducting the operation would continue to monitor whether capture becomes infeasible; and

(3) Such an operation would be conducted consistent with applicable law of war principles.

What does any of this have to do with domestic terrorists like Bernardine Dohrn and Bill Ayers?

Click here to view the 46 legacy comments

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (1)
All Comments   (1)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
The morally correct answer is that Americans serving in the Weather Underground or other domestic terrorist groups should be treated the same as those serving in Al Qaida.

But, of course, that doesn't mean they will be. Some of these groups are fashionable, especially within the Democratic Party. They will certainly not be condemned or, if they are, it will be with a wink. Groups that are on the Left are inherently embraced by their fellow Leftists, particularly the current Occupier of the White House.

[Forgive me if this appears twice, I'm having challenges with the new "improved" system.]
2 years ago
2 years ago Link To Comment
View All