Which of the 5 Avengers Prequels Is the Best?
The Incredible Hulk
This is the second installment of the Hulk, building off of the awful Ang Lee version without even acknowledging it.
The one thing I hear about this movie is how great Ed Norton is as Bruce Banner.
Sorry. I’m just not seeing it.
In fact, I think Norton’s performance is overshadowed by Tim Roth’s. When you watch the trailer, it reminds you just how well Roth embodied the attitude of Emil Blonsky, a confidence that mutates into arrogance before devolving into an unrestrained lust for power.
Roth’s performance allows you to accept that the flawed super-soldier formula not only amplified Blonsky physically, but mentally. The arrogance and recklessness are boosted, leading him to eventually force Sam Sterns to give him the power the Hulk has and, incidentally, creating yet another Hulk villain in Sterns. That was well done and possibly sets up the premise for the next Hulk movie.
Bottom line: Roth acted circles around the others in this film.
And I’ve already talked about my thoughts on General Thunderbolt Ross.
The scenes with the Hulk look amazing and the action sequences are some of the best ever in a comic book movie. The movie also does a great job in humanizing the Hulk, showing that he isn’t just a mindless monster, but can act out of love and concern for others.
Overall, the movie is a great way to further the character without actually rebooting him, and by itself was a great adaption of the comic to film. But it’s just not as good as the other films that help bring <em>The Avengers</em> to life.
Not a Fan Boy here, more of a Dilettante but,
That being said.. I would them in the following order from least to best.
5. Thor.. it was well acted and had a spectacular cast, but the visuals reminded me of Highlander 2 the Quickening.. arguably the worst movie of all time.
4. The Incredible Hulk.. While head an shoulders above the Ang Lee abortion, I still found the plot ponderous and slow moving.
3. Captain America… An enjoyable film, well shot and acted, but never really had me on the edge of my seat..
the Top two slots were a tossup… and I know I might get grief for this choice but here goes..
2. Iron Man.. Excellent film, Downey JR is excellent..Effects were great plot was good, action sequences Top Notch.. However… The Battle with Iron Monger at the end.. Formulaic and Cliche.. thats why it leads me to..
# 1.. Iron Man 2.. Loved the Congressional Hearing where Downey Jr called the Goverment “a$$clowns” and told them they couldnt have his Personal Property. Rockwell played Justin Hammer like a completely smarmy D-Bag, down to the Self tanner on his hands when he meets Vanko. Loved the thing with Starks Father, Tony facing death from the Palladium and emotionally coming apart from it.. I didnt care one whit that they combined the Crimson Dynamo and Whiplash.. Didnt care about Scarlett Jo in it, she was window dressing. I thought Don Cheadle was much better than Terrance Howard as Rhodey… I could go on… but I wont
CDM
Please forgive me for my attrocious spelling, capitalization and punctuation.
I was typing at a mile a minute.
“Highlander 2 the Quickening.. arguably the worst movie of all time”
I had really enjoyed the first Highlander, and when I heard they were making a sequel i was excited. Made sure to see it the weekend it opened.
The last of my youthful hope and faith in mankind was brutally torn away that day.
There can only be one.
Highlander 2: The Sickening.
There should have been only one.
Yeah, but that’s some damn nice window dressing.
Great list just reverse Incredible Hulk and I.M. 2 Hulk suffered another miscast with Liv Tyler as Betty so they got all the Ross family wrong. I.M 2 had some great comedic moments but the joining of two of his enemies into one bad one ruined it, and Happy came of as a total idiot. Everything else was spot on.
I have to go with the Iron Man movies as well, with 2 slightly edging out the 1st. Downey’s Stark was so well played that he actually became less interesting when he put the suit on.
Solid casting for the secondary roles as well. I slightly preferred Bridges’ Stane to Rourke’s Whiplash, but both were excellent. I think one reason that the Iron Man comic had always been a second tier one for Marvel was that the character never had any well-defined archnemesis. X-Men had Magneto, the Fantastic Four had Doctor Doom, but the best Iron Man could muster was the Mandarin. (Don’t think I’ve read a new comic in 20+ years, but for years I was an unabashed Marvel nerd…)
As an added bonus, Tony Stark may have the one garage that Jay Leno would look at with envy. If you can get past the shock of horror at the fate of the Cobra in the 1st film. Just keep telling yourself “it was only a kitcar…it was only a kitcar”.
I totally concur on the garage..
I had the same thought in IM1 – not the Cobra!
Iron Man 1 then Iron Man 2. The other three were fun, but are utterly forgettable. I can watch Iron Man 1 and 2 everyday and still be entertained.
Iron Man 1, Cap, and Thor are REALLY close to each other in terms of quality. I honestly don’t know which one I’d give the top slot to, though I might actually lean against Iron Man, simply because the villain’s grand plan doesn’t quite measure up:
– Loki: win father’s favor through genocide
– Red Skull: decapitate every major world power in one strike
– Stane: …uh, escape the feds?
Iron Man 2, though still awesome, I’d rank as the weakest. At first it sets itself up to be the most ambitious and substantive, by asking an interesting, challenging question: can one man be trusted to wield so much power autonomously? When Tony gets drunk in what’s basically a WMD, threatens his guests, and demolishes his house, the answer seems to be no, which was pretty gutsy, making you wonder how our hero will redeem himself. And then…..they almost completely ignore it for the rest of the movie. Tony doesn’t make amends, Nick Fury doesn’t care, Pepper and Rhodey only treat him like it’s just a personal dispute, and nobody else brings it up. Plus, we really don’t see Tony proactively being heroic all that much.
Lastly, one point about Cap’s shield: adamantium is probably tied up with the X-Men film rights, making it off limits to Marvel Studios.
Hey! Escaping the feds would actually be more difficult than decapitating all the major world powers, or winning a god’s favor through genocide!
Seriously, I am generally bored by action pictures and am NOT a comics nerd – I consider the entire panoply a mere footnote to Will Eisner, so there – and I like these movies. They’re doing something right to draw in the rest of us.
“Captain America.” Now one of my top ten movies of all time. I had been waiting about 40 years to see that movie!
I never cared for Cap until I saw the movie. It had a great pulp feel in an Indiana Jones kind of way. Very enjoyable.
Mrs. Emma Peel will always be the best Avenger.
– all these comics back in the Sixties, it is amazing to see them go from varying forms of animation to poor television adaptations to superlative 3-D special effect CGI films. Stan Lee, in his 90 years, lived to see it; just wish Jack Kirby had too.
While I read all the Marvel comics I could get my hands on back in the day, I haven’t seen any of the movies listed, at least not all the way through. Whatever fanboy points you give the logic, I find them painful to watch, they don’t work as movies.
LOTR worked reasonably well as a movie, it was both (mostly) true to the books and the media translation was done brilliantly. And hey, maybe the source material was stronger, too.
I waited impatiently for decades until the CGI could bring us comic book movies, but like any move adaptation of a good book, success is rare. All the hype of this Avengers, well, we’ll see.
A lot of the virtue in comic books is the great art of the drawings. The whole idea of guys in their underwear saving the universe maybe works better at lo res, at hi res you look at it and at least I can’t keep from going, “hey what?”
Iron Man by a wide margin. Everything was simply perfect.
I’d put The Hulk next. I simply liked Ed Norton as Banner, and while Tim Roth overshadowed him that seems a common element in these superhero comic movies where the hero is expected to have carry over effect but the villain only gets one shot at being relevant.
Next is Captain America, which was generally good but seemed to be missing that extra something to make a major classic.
Then Iron Man 2. It suffered from having two villains, which wound up in neither getting sufficient character development, and seemed a bit forced in getting Jim Rhodes into a suit of armor, but it still had a solid performance from Robert Downey Jr.
Thor comes in last. While the characters and setting were well done, too much of the story came off as just a set up for The Avengers, unlike the other movies which had solid standalone stories. Thor just doesn’t have that without knowing The Avengers is coming next.
About the “botched” Fantastic Four movies: the problem was in the portrayal of Reed Richards and Sue Storm, and their relationship. In the original comic (memories of fifty years past coming to the fore, here), Reed Richards was a strong, confident man — a brilliant and hard-working scientist who did not lack for confidence. Sue Storm, likewise, was a strong woman, confident woman who nonetheless did not have her future husband’s ambition or intellect. Richards had rivals for Sue’s heart (Prince Namor, for one), but was generally confident that he would win in the end, and if not, life would go on. Like any alpha male.
The curse of modern movies is they have to make the woman into a man’s rival. If he’s strong, she has to be stronger. If he’s smart, she has to be smarter. I. Am. Freaking. Woman. It gets old.
Ioan Gruffudd’s Reed Richards (and I like Gruffudd’s work, he was terrific in the Hornblower series), not to put too fine a spin on it, was a wimp. Effortlessly browbeaten both by his erstwhile rival, Victor von Doom, and even by his erstwhile fiance, Richards was portrayed as a passive, desperate ‘yes’ man. Sue had to chew him out at one point for being such a wuss, and still fell for him again anyway? Not in any parallel world I’m familiar with. Women don’t like wimps, and they won’t marry them.
But to make the woman stronger, too many writers take the easy way out, of making the man look weaker. And besides, lovely as she is, Jessica Alba was miscast as Sue Storm. The Sue Storm of the comic book was not a flashy beauty — more Earth-mother than pole dancer. She was tall and dignified and not a youngster — someone more along the lines of Teri Polo.
I really disliked the last Hulk movie. I thought the Ang Lee one was much better – I wish they had just made a sequel.
Otherwise, I liked Iron Man the best followed by Thor, Captain America, and Iron Man 2.
My girlfriend is 50 -ish and has never read a comic book in her life. She is an interior designer, gardener, furniture restorer. You get the picture. She loved Iron Man.
I agree with your ranking.
#7 – Yes
#11 – Also yes. Johnny Storm and the Thing were great, but I also am sick of the Hollywood “war on Real Men”.
Yeah because we all know that “real men” are just like Stark and Bannner.
A difficult comparison, but I suppose that I enjoyed Captain America the most. It is a well-told origin story, with plenty of character development; like Spiderman, or Batman Begins, or X-Men: First Class.
Iron Man is also an origin story, but I got the feeling that it was a bit rushed. I got the same feeling with Thor. Still pretty good though.
The Incredible Hulk is underrated in my opinion; the plot gets a bit confusing towards the end, but “Hulk, Smash!” is worth the price of admission.
I’d rate Iron Man, Thor, and Hulk about the same, and unfortunately I missed Iron Man 2.
I’m 53 so I remember when comics were 12¢. I wish I would have saved mine.
I think all the movies were great and yah, Iron Man was the best ride of them all. It seems the Avengers side of the Marvel universe, and Spiderman, got all the good scripts.
Is DCs Superman just too damn over “powered” to get a good script? The international-male version of Superman we got in the last installment was even worse than the Chris Reeve Superman movies. At least we have the Dark Knight.
Admittedly not a movie, but the Smallville series did a generally decent job with the character once they moved past the ‘freak of the week’ early shows and started to develop the character arcs.
The Luthors, especially Lionel (John Glover), probably had the best writing in the series though.
Iron Man
Not a fan boy, so the jarring differences the author found never affected me. So from my view point and in order of the most enjoyable to least enjoyable.
1. Iron Man 2
2. Iron Man 1
3. Thor
4. Hulk 2
5. Hulk 1
I feel Robert Downey Jr. was absolutely inspired and made a name for himself and the Iron Man franchise, “He is Iron Man”. Reminds me of Arnold Schwarzenegger and his Terminator role only better.
Where’s Captain America?
The hands down winner is Capt. America. None of the other films understood or really used the tone of their source material. Capt. America, for those of you who read Avengers #4 on, know this film knew what it was about. It understood the little things about Marvel that made it Marvel.
The mistake the Iron Man films made was that it had high profile actors and then had to give them something to do as actors rather than let them subvert themselves to the larger project. Downey is not Stark, and Rourke was a mistake. Having the Mandarin would’ve be much better. There was a reason for the build up in Capt. America, and maybe one can argue in the first Iron Man, but there’s no excuse for all the hemming and hawing and the ‘acting’ in Iron Man 2.
I only wish the people who’d made Capt. America had made John Carter, an unfortunate project bad from the first word, and the exact opposite when it came to understanding the source material. John Carter is so bad, an adaptation of that book can arguably not yet exist, so misdone was the entire tone.
#1: THOR!
Reason – Chris Hemsworth.
Iron Man stands out. Growing up, I was always a Hulk fan. That may be why I was disappointed by the Hulk movies. As for Captain America, they killed Bucky.
guess the censor didn’t like my comment how bs this is?
I think I’m the only one who liked Ang Lee’s “Hulk”. Casting was great and Eric Bana was the best Dr. Banner of the three. I liked the set-up of the dysfunctional and homicidal family life that made Banner so full of rage, and the way Col. Ross so casually tossed the young boy aside as ‘collateral damge’. There was no super-villian, only all the selfishness, greed and carelessnes of the people involved with Banner and his alter-ego. It was a good story and I also liked the comic book-like panels that were used to shift scenes. Bring back Sam Elliot as Thunderbolt Ross for Avengers 2!