<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2012/02/20/nanotech-balancing-real-risk-political-risk-and-the-risk-of-hype/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:07:41 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Nanotech: Balancing real risk, political risk and the risk of hype</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Vincent Caprio, executive director of the NanoBusiness Commercialization Association, asked me to contribute to his series of interviews with influential voices in the science and business of nanotech. So, I interviewed Andrew Maynard, director of the Risk Science Center at the University of Michigan, who has been studying risks associated with nanotech for more than a decade. He had some interesting things to say about assessing risk based on science, rather than political pressure, the need to alter one&amp;#8217;s views as more becomes known about nanotech and the risk of overhyping a technology. Here&amp;#8217;s an excerpt:]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:42:33 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Howard Lovy]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/howard-lovy/2012/02/20/nanotech-balancing-real-risk-political-risk-and-the-risk-of-hype-n138937</link></item></channel></rss>