Batman: Arkham City—First Impressions
The Caped Crusader is back in video game form. But is he worth playing?
October 19, 2011 - 12:32 pm
I’ve only put about an hour into the game, following Tuesday night’s GOP presidential debate, but so far Arkham City surpasses the brilliant original while bringing the best parts of Asylum forward. The story so far is again, tight and intriguing. The visuals are striking and detailed, as in the original, but perhaps a bit better looking. The atmospherics are dead on dark and fun, a Halloween party on steroids. By moving Batman from an island to a large slice of Gotham, Arkham City opens play to a massive new level. Arkham Asylum never felt confining except in the tunnels and spaces where it should, but City delivers, well, a city. Batman can swing, glide and grapnel from the tops of cathedrals and courthouses to the streets and sewers across great distances, battling thugs and interrogating inmates along the way. In the span of just an hour or so, the game already introduced Catwoman (as a playable character), Two-Face with his dual nature, the Penguin, Harley Quinn and the Joker. But they’re introduced and used in a way that works with and moves the story, and they’re not over-the-top or cartoony. Catwoman is lithe and ambiguous. Two-Face is a horror Hamlet. Penguin is a drab, evil little man seeking revenge. Joker is the nasty, creepy clown with scars and an army of henchmen in make-up that he was in Arkham Asylum. Or so he seems; I haven’t actually seen him yet but he has injected himself into the storyline with a sniper’s shot. And the Riddler is already in the background, hiding trophies and taunting Batman from the shadows, just as he did in the original. City’s opening set pieces are not villain overload, but just good Batman fun.
One of Arkham City’s great strengths so far is just how open the play is. You’re not on rails or locked into following the story immediately. Once you’re past the first few segments, which alternate cut scenes with game play, you’re Batman. You can follow the story or you can treat Arkham City as your sandbox. You have several of his gadgets at your disposal, including the Batclaw, the Batarang, the grapnel, an explosive gel, and his detective vision that allows him to see weaknesses in structures, armed enemies, hidden features and crawl spaces, and more. Armed with those gadgets and let loose in the city, you’re free to just play Batman if you want. Climb buildings. Leap off them and glide over city block after city block. Drop down and beat down some villainous henchmen and then drop a smoke bomb and disappear. Sit up on a gargoyle or flagpole and check out the scene. It’s up to you and how quickly you want to progress through the tale. It’s also up to you how you fight the game’s thugs and villains. Stealth, knuckles and boots, Batarangs, Batclaw and explosives — it’s up to you.
The game isn’t perfect. It’s a bit too easy to just get lost by falling off a building or over-flying your goal. The remote control Batarang still takes some getting used to when you’re learning how to control it. But to the extent that those are even flaws — and they’re not, really — they don’t get in the way of what looks like it’s going to be an epic Batman adventure. Other reviews I’ve seen give Batman: Arkham City either 9 out of 10 or even 10 out of 10. So far, it’s a 10 to me. Batman: Arkham City is attracting a lot of hype and acclaim, and it deserves both.
Next stop: Arkham Nation? I hope so.