More Race Incitement in Obama Speeches from 2007
Obama eventually took the podium and delivered a speech in Selma much like the one that the new video shows he delivered in Hampton, Virginia. Again, an extended excerpt from Injustice:
Obama took to the pulpit and hit all the necessary notes. To establish his racial bona fides, he began by invoking a dear friend of his in Chicago. “I must send greetings from Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. but I got a letter giving me encouragement and saying how proud he was that I had announced and encouraging me to stay true to my ideals and my values and not to be fearful.”
If an upper-middle class childhood in Hawaii didn’t lend itself to adequate racial suffering, Obama reminded the congregation about the plight of his father at the hands of the British. “My Grandfather was a cook to the British in Kenya. Grew up in a small village and all his life, that’s all he was—a cook and a house boy. And that’s what they called him, even when he was 60 years old. They called him a house boy. They wouldn’t call him by his last name. Sound familiar?” Of course it sounded familiar to everyone in Brown Chapel. It wasn’t a question. It was a bloody shirt.
Obama continued, “Yet something happened back here in Selma, Alabama.… [It] sent a shout across oceans so that my grandfather began to imagine something different for his son. His son, who grew up herding goats in a small village in Africa, could suddenly set his sights a little higher and believe that maybe a black man in this world had a chance.” His father got his chance, Obama said, when the Kennedy White House organized an “airlift” that brought groups of Africans to the United States for an education.
The story was touching, though largely inaccurate. Obama’s attempt to link his family with the Kennedys is undermined by the fact that when his father came to the United States, the president was Dwight Eisenhower, not Kennedy. And by the time the Selma march took place in 1965, Obama’s father, then on his third wife, had already been chased out of Harvard University and had his scholarship cut off for personal reasons including being a suspected polygamist. At the time of the Selma marches, his father had already left America and been back in Kenya for eight months.
But the facts weren’t important. What mattered was Obama inserting himself into civil rights history—and he wasn’t subtle about doing so. “So don’t tell me I don’t have a claim on Selma, Alabama,” he intoned on the heels of his highly embellished story. “Don’t tell me I’m not coming home to Selma, Alabama.”
Playing to the crowd, Obama attacked the Bush Justice Department’s race-neutral enforcement of civil rights laws. “The single most significant concern that this Justice Department under this administration has had with respect to discrimination has to do with affirmative action. That they have basically spent all their time worrying about colleges and universities around the country that are giving a little break to young African Americans and Hispanics to make sure that they can go to college, too.”
Obama was referring to a DOJ action against Southern Illinois University. However, his characterization of the case was disingenuous; in fact, the university was handing out scholarships to people only of particular races, excluding whites. What Obama called a “little break” was actually the provision of racially discriminatory taxpayer-funded scholarships. Needless to say, his casual assertion that the Bush DOJ “spent all their time” fighting such cases was grossly inaccurate, but such fables can mesmerize many—and they certainly hit their mark with his audience in Selma.
Recapitulating the famous attacks on the Selma marchers of 1965, Obama assured his listeners that he was a trustworthy traveler in their continuing cause. “When you see heads gashed open and eyes burning and children lying hurt on the side of the road, when you are John Lewis and you’ve been beaten within an inch of your life on Sunday, how do you wake up Monday and keep on marching? Be strong and have courage, for I am with you wherever you go.” That last sentence was a curious use of the first person, part of a biblical statement (Genesis 28:15) made by God that Obama uttered without attribution.
After the speeches, Obama made his way to the podium on the church steps outside. Also speaking from the podium would be our friend, the New Black Panther chief Malik Zulu Shabazz. They both addressed the crowd.
- Malik Zulu Shabazz flanked by Najee Muhammad
- Obama
After the speeches, the speakers departed for the Edmund Pettus Bridge. The uniformed New Black Panthers stayed close behind Obama in the crowd of thousands, raising their fists high in the air as they crossed the bridge behind the future president. The media, in keeping with their new role of having abdicated their responsibilities under the First Amendment, have failed to ask a single question about the appearance with the Panthers. Among the abdicated inquiries: Who asked the New Black Panthers to come? Did the campaign? Malik Shabazz said he spoke with Obama that day – about what? Did Obama know that the Panthers were an anti-Semitic hate group before he appeared with them? Does Obama regret doing it?
The answers to these questions might play as well in Dayton and Des Moines as do nutty racial conspiracy theories about Hurricane Katrina.
Related:
No, Obama’s Divisive 2007 Speech is Not ‘Old News’
Sunlight!
Breaking on FoxNews, Drudge, & PJM!
Archduke Franz Ferdinand has been shot!
The Not-October Not-Surprise.
Game over. Thanks for playing.
You guys are like monkeys trowing poop. The only ones who get a rise out of the poop throwing are the monkeys themselves.
So you knew he was a hate-filled racist all along, and supported him?
Is that because you, too, are a hate-filled racist?
The video was covered by CNN and even Tucker Carlson himself, along with other networks. This is NOT news. It is to you because you want it to be and it somehow, in your twisted racist mind, conforms to a narrative you already want to believe (i.e. angry black man). Just more preaching to the choir. You may be talking about this tomorrow but nobody else will. I smell desperation …
Actually, the fact that you are frantically commenting on articles on conservative websites to try to convince people this is not a story is the desperate activity. Nice try though!
Desperation. The race card is all you got left.
At the very least you could have done better than an old 2007 video that was widely covered.
Sorry Mr. Wonder. The one playing the race card is the Hawaiian using the over the top, phony, black, southern accent. But keep up the good work. I can tell you are trying really hard. A for effort!
That explains why Stephanie Cutter is asking Romney to apologize for a speech Obama made then?
“At the very least you could have done better than an old 2007 video that was widely covered.”
Only if you mean “covered” in the sense of “covered up”.
There were reporters there, and they reported only on the prepared text, not the bile he actually vented.
People wonder why race relations have gone backwards under a president who proclaimed that he would improve them.
This video shows that he is not the person he made out to be.
For those people who gave him the benefit of the doubt this recent video is a reminder that this president, as proven by his actions in the last few years, isn’t and never was interested in improving race relations.
But lets focus on the ‘important’ ‘news’.
The alphabet media will no doubt drag up some realy old news to discredit O’s opponents.
ABC’s and the Washington Post reports on Perry come to mind. How his family leased hunting grounds (Almost 20 years ago), which were once was known by a racist name that is derogatory towards blacks.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/rick-perry-contests-story-on-propertys-name-bearing-racial-slur/
Riiight..
Why is the NYT, the Illiberal bastion ABOVE all old news, ‘oddly’ going into greater detail, albeit 5 + years later regarding the bizarro, divisive video?
Come on!
Rational thinking, I highly recommend it. It’s a rush!
How many idiotic items are you gonna give this empty suit? Err ‘genius’? Asinine.
It matters–an important part of a “TOTAL MELT DOWN” OF DECEPTION
“THE MASK FALLS AWAY: WE SEE BIGOT, LIAR, AND INCOMPETENT”]
What a heck of a day—we saw your “mask” fall away
And you can’t blame your own Media for your loss!
Since we’ve seen the “real you”, the faithful you knew,
Are now leaving to find a new “boss”
Back then, you were feted and flattered
“I am your new savior”, you cried!
With teleprompter on, and smile firmly in place,
Few had cause to believe that you lied.
And those lies came so fast–you were sure they must last,
After all, you had carefully planned,
To subvert and destroy the Republic you loathed,
Would be done in four years at your hand!
We all started so well, on your “highway to hell”,
You and yours set a record for fraud.
That apology tour *seemed* a rousing success!
But we’re watching OUR GUYS DYING abroad.
Still, your lies kept improving, your policies moving,
Us closer and closer to a crash.
“Curb free speech”, “run on wind”; “we’ll let everyone in”,
And those “seniors”?—sorry; just don’t have the cash!
Since “the start of the end”, you must wonder again,
“How in hell” did we “rubes” find your flaws?
With your Media Whores, you should win all the wars!
You finagled and mangled our laws!
It took time BUT WE LEARNED that you never had earned,
Even ONE THING you claimed to be true.
(“But I sealed EVERY record” you whispered to friends),
AND NO ONE PLAYED “RACE CARDS”LIKE YOU!
Your plan’s fallen apart, and you don’t have the heart,
To “regroup”, “start again” or “revise”.
When proofs came of your historic deceptions,
You could’nt keep straight your OWN lies!
You’re so horribly proud, you will NOT be allowed,
To just claim “one mistake” and move on.
You’re dismayed at the fury of the PEOPLE YOU DECEIVED;
And you’re STAGGERED your opponent’s so strong!
You will try to “play through”, till the voters tell you,
That your adventure in GOLFING is done.
Pack your things, leave our House, you despicable louse,
And STOP saying that you were “THE WON”.
IT’S ALL COMING APART AND CRASHING DOWN
ROMNEY & RYAN WIN BIG – IN ONE MONTH!
This stuff is making an impact. In 2008, a close friend’s father was one of those nice suburban voters who gave Obama a chance. This year my friend complains his father has been inundating his family with e-mails about what a radical, race baiting liar Obama is.
Just one question for every voter out there: Have 3 plus years of an Obama administration brought racial healing to the country, or are we as divided a country as ever before?
I think we had made progress but have gone backwards a bit the last three years.
Obama has been enormously divisive, in both his actions as President and in his re-election campaign.
But we don’t need videos from 2007 (or even earlier) to realize that.
Obama has a track record as President. That’s what the voters will judge him on.
#War
Everyone thought black people were along on the Judging people by the content of their character and not race, ethnic background or color.
The black folks have never believed that and never wanted to live together in peace with other races/colors of skin.
Pay back, hate and dominance in order to live their life the way they wish regardless of what the laws say.
Black people will never see whites as brothers nor friends.
Yep – Which is why I support segregation. Pick a state, empty it out, and move ALL the black folk into it. Lock the doors and let them have at it.
I’m sick to death of the garbage.
I have to disagree. Just as it is with white people, generalizations don’t work. I have met garbage of all colors, it is not a blacks only thing. And yes I can give you glowing examples on both sides:
Lindsy Lohan Vs. Denzel Washington.
So when is the video of Allen West going to come out?
A bit like Robert Byrd at a Klan rally, eh?
The behavior seems to reoccur in Democrats, doesn’t it?
Nothing will happen to Obamee unless we make it happen.
Unless we turn out in numbers that assure a mandate for small government.
If Obamee steals this election, and you stay home and grumble and send emails and complain to your family and say “well next time” and YOU DO NOTHING, then we will have lost this country for good.
Your kids and grandkids will be enslaved by the government, yoked to a 90% tax rate and inflation so awful that the days of burning currency to stay warm in the Weimar Republic will look like a field trip to the museum.
You will have to rise up and resist this illegal, immoral, unconscionable government. Obamee should have been impeached and made to resign in 2011. We did nothing. We did not demand impeachment from our leaders. Now, we pay.
And we will pay every remaining second of our lives until we are out there peacefully demonstrating by the millions.
“If Obamee steals this election”
You guys are the ones messing with absentee ballots down there in Florida, and now elsewhere. republicans can’t win elections the old fashioned way because your ideas are stale and unpopular (i.e. destroying Social Security and Medicare), so you have to try and rig the election. All your unconstitutional voter suppression efforts are rightly beinging smacked down right and left by the courts as we speak. In the end the Constitution wins. You will be stopped at every turn with your un-American efforts to undermine it. Your ideology is nothing more than recycled 1930s fascism.
LOL, substitute “Jews” for “rich” in anything the dems say today and compare that to the Nazi’s (another leftist/socialist organization). “Voter suppression” by rear end more like voting rights for corpses and illegals.
Nazis were a right wing ideology. I suppose, however, you have convinced yourself otherwise. This is not at all surprising.
@ Cynical Wonder “Nazi’s were a right wing ideology’. LOL!!! That’s why their top-down crony corporatist party was called the National SOCIALIST WORKER’S Party!
“Wonder” how ignorant someone can be? “Wonder” no more! What a maroon!
Aw, another product of liberal run educational indoctrination. There was nothing “right wing” aka “conservative” about the Nazis, they were/are a socialist organization vieing for the same demographic as the communists, they aren’t opposites, their siblings. The Nazis added nationalism (an honest admission), the communists insisted (falsely) that their brand of socialism was “international”.
The Nazis controlled industry by making sure those who run industry became members of the party, the Communists controlled industry by making sure those who run industry were replaced with party members.
The Nazis policy was one of redistribution, money and raw materials from Jews and other nations, power from the people to the party. The Communists policy was one of redistribution, money and raw materials from capitalists and other nations, power from the people to the party.
The only difference between them was that the 8mm Mauser is slightly bigger diameter than the 7.62×57 Mossin-Nagant.
You can wish all you like that the nazis were somehow “conservative” but that doesn’t make it so, they were self proclaimed revolutionaries, the “right wing” conservatives supported the Wiemar Republic.
You should ask for a refund from your free education, you got cheated.
Oh yes C. Blunder, and the KKK is Progressive/Socialist. Why? Just because… “You guys” know all about that down on the Animal Farm.
“You guys”, cutting it close. Self censorship is C. Wonderful! Careful. But you are “out” anyway.
Then, what about… this… “You guys”, “you people”, yeah.
Obi-jonKenobi
I could go on but what’s the point, you people actually seem to ENJOY being lied to.
August 30, 2012 – 9:52 am
Jaycen
You people don’t care…
August 26, 2012 – 5:55 pm
Cynical Wonder
What you people…
August 26, 2012 – 5:01 pm
So mant more…
Is this lying? Posting with many ID’s? Can’t, wont answer?
nd yes, C. Blunder has such high standards. Where all others are concerned. Do you pull this on your “progressive “friends” too? Do you tell them about your multiples? Do they understand, such dishonesty? It is for the cause, right?
Mr. President loves you, “you people” know he really does. Gin?
Buuuck, buck, buck, buck.
No, lefty idiot, it was the National SOCIALIST Party. They distinguished themselves from the true Moscow-following communists by allowing continued private ownership of property so long as the state had power over the use of that property. Kinda the same thing Comrade Obama and the Soros Junta are doing; a business supports the junta and it lives long and prospers, opposes the regime and the whole federal alphabet soup gets unleashed on it.
You’re a tiresome POS; hope Soros’ commies are paying you well for your efforts because if you really believe the crap coming out of your fingers, you’re too stupid to live.
Isn’t it crazy how the American right wing ties itself up into knots trying to disown the Nazis as a right wing group, even though they are similar in literally every single way?
1. Hate gays? Check.
2. Hate unions? Check.
3. Hate intellectuals? Check.
4. Hate religious minorities? Check.
5. Hate immigrants? Check.
6. Believe that any problem can be solved by waving the flag harder? Check.
If I didn’t know any better, I’d say that the only difference between the American right wing and the Nazi party is opportunity.
“Nazis were a right wing ideology.”
*sigh*
The reason idiots like you consider Nazi’s “right-wing” is because Stalin declared them “right deviationists”. Yes, they were to the “right” of Stalin, but they were still Socialists.
(When will you lefties stop following Stalin’s orders?)
Sam K, your ignorance of the American right is depressing. You actually feel comfortable speaking in public with so little facts to back you?
To Sam K:
1. Hate gays? Check.
Conservatives do not hate gays. This is words the socialists like Sam K like to put in the mouths of conservatives to put us on the defensive. Conservatives believe that gays have the same rights as anyone else but do not warrant having any special rights because of their sexuality. Gays, on the other hand, force us to tolerate their very bad behavior and try to inundate the airwaves and TV programing to insist they are normal when they are less than 2% of the population in the US. As an aside, islam kills gays and people who they think are gay.
2. Hate unions? Check.
Conservatives do not hate unions. As a tool for keeping the balance between labor and management, they used to be quite effective but what conservatives hate is their dues being scooped up to go to the coffers to elect democrats. And, they hate that they undermine good fiscal policy to get bennies and perks for their “leaders” while the rank and file are treated badly by both management and union officers.
3. Hate intellectuals? Check.
Conservatives do not hate intellectuals. But we do despise self-proclaimed intellectuals who dictate that others need to behave a certain way while they, themselves do the opposite. (By the way, Wm F. Buckley was an intellectual and conservatives didn’t hate him.) Secondly, intellect for the sole purpose of
proving to others how elite you are is a bullshit way to live life. Sitting around postulating how others “do it all wrong” and laughing at the person who doesn’t understand the difference between different types of caviar is elitism, not intellectualism. Intellectuals who cannot fathom why it’s important to brush one’s teeth or understand the real intention of the Constitution can go to hell, however.
4. Hate religious minorities? Check.
Mormons are a religious minority. By contrast, muslims number 23% of the world’s population. What conservatives hate is their propensity to kill people who don’t believe as they do. When was the last time a devout Christian went on “jihad” and found a bunch of muslims to blow up while wearing a C-4 vest? And if you argue that the crusades were the Christians trying to kill muslims at every turn, then I reply that it was in response to the original jihad that took place in the middle ages. And, Christianity has moved along with the times. Sometimes more, sometimes less. Islam is still in the seventh century. Are women allowed to go to school? Are they allowed to drive? Are they allowed to marry whom they want? Are they even allowed to show their face? Tell me, if an islamic woman gets raped, who do they stone to death?
5. Hate immigrants? Check.
Conservatives do not hate immigrants. My grandparents were immigrants. They did it the right way. They had to get educated on US history and pass a test and pay some fees. But they loved the United States for the opportunities that were not available in their native land. What conservatives hate are immigrants who come here, demand we speak their language, refuse to acknowledge they are not participating in our system and who refuse to obey the law.
6. Believe that any problem can be solved by waving the flag harder? Check.
If by that you mean we are die-hard constitutionalists who think that the founding of this nation was predicated on a Judeo-Christian ethic and that the cumbersome process of laws is necessary, then you’ve got me. Have you ever worn the uniform of the US military? Do you know the crap military members have to put up with to just do their job every day so people like you have the right to vomit your opinion without the fear of the government coming after you? You don’t, do you?
In fact, there’s a lot you don’t know. You spout the Obama talking points and have no working knowledge of history, people or good manners. By your posts I also believe that you think rules are for other people, not you. Because, after all, you do everything right. I’m sure you recycle, drive an electric-powered buckboard, never burn anything, and even if a tree falls in your yard, you give it a decent burial to return it to gaia. But I doubt you have a yard because you also speak like a typical city-dweller whose needs are all met by the government and if you need smokes or beer, you hit the corner convenience store in your flip-flops, shorts and tank-top that says, “Go Green”.
You’re pathetic. You do not contribute to the conversation, you simply express your frustration that the world isn’t to your liking. But even if everything on your agenda was met, that wouldn’t be good enough for you. You’d still find something wrong with everybody else. Then, in your utopia, you’d be the last person left on Earth. But there’d be no one there to feed you, clothe you, house you and take you to the Lady Gaga concerts.
Samk,
Conservatives do not “hate immigrants”. Many of us ARE immigrants, or have immigrants in our families, who tell us of how socialism and communism messed up their home countries, and that’s why we ARE conservatives.
We hate ILLEGAL immigrants.
Remember, Illegal immigration is to immigration as rape is to sex. I am appalled that liberals confuse the two.
No, the better comparison is substituting “Muslim” for “Jew”. No one is talking about killing rich people, but it is pretty clear that right wingers have the same reaction to the sight of a Mosque as Nazis did to the sight of a Synagogue: “Let’s burn it down.”
For you and your friend above:
Jews didn’t attack Germany, muslims did attack the US.
Pro muslim antisemitism is rampant in the LEFT.
Hate minorities,check, the left has kept them chained with government dependence ever since the “right” liberated them from the slavery of the dems.
The left doesn’t hate religious minorities, only the reglions that aren’t anti-US.
Equating patriotism with nazism, how “progressive” of you comrade.
All in all, neither of you are worth another reply. You can hide behind your self imposed ignorance until your allies behead you in the name of the cult you defend.
Name a mosque that’s been burnt down for reasons other than an insurance scam.
I fail to see how anything the past 12 administrations has done can be considered Constitutional.
If you truly believe that what is happening now (mandated health care, drug laws, involuntary detention without trial etc.) are Constitutional, pray tell…please cite an amendment wherein these mandates, laws and restrictions are enumerated.
Unless you are writing of Anti-Constitutional mandates, which would make more sense.
That’s a lie. You’re people are the ones trying to suppress the military vote – against a law that obeyme signed into law in 2009.
You people can’t win unless you cheat. That’s why you fight voter id laws and why you refuse to purge dead people off your rolls.
And BTW – fascists were leftwing – NOT right wing. Does National SOCIALIST Party mean anything to you?
The National Socialist Party (Nazional Socialismus) in Germany, Adolf Hitler’s Party was – as its name says – a nationalist socialist party. The Fascist Party in Italy was founded by Benito Mussolini in World War I. He was a leader of the Italian Socialist Party and editor of its newspapers Avanti. Socialist doctrine was that wars were between capitalists, and the Italian socialist party did not support Italy during World War I (Italy was fighting against Germany, allied with Great Britain and France). By 1917, Mussolini had decided to support the war, and he invented the Fascist Party to be a nationalist socialist party. That is why the Nazi party was a fascist one.
Hitler’s Brownshirts were homosexual.
More sultry sounds from #GhettoBarryBooBoo
Where’s the video?
CSPAN
Thanks (if I can find it). Pretty nifty, too, talking all about it, then: nothing. No video. And this isn’t the first time.
NOTE: to pjmedia; I just noticed that by default “I” may have signed up for “Daily Digest” in my previous post. But now I hereby rescind “my” signature. Don’t send me any Daily Digests, or direct me to sites that waste my time. Thanks.
Amazing thing that Google. 15 key strokes and 4 seconds reveals:
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/196943-1
I agree; how hard was that. But you know very well that that was NOT the point, that is, unless I’m completely wrong about internet protocol: In short, if the whole premise is based on a video, put up the VIDEO. Or clearly display a link – not to a black screen at Daily Caller, or The Hill, or any other “Fair Use” violator.
The whole “premise” was based on my book. The book quotes the video at length. The book has a footnote to the video link to the Selma speech. Not sure where there is a “black screen” at Daily Caller anywhere in this piece.
Here’s what led me here: “A J. CHRISTIAN ADAMS FOLLOWUP TO THAT DAILY CALLER VIDEO: More Race Incitement in Obama Speeches from 2007. It’s like that whole “post-racial” thing was just a scam or something.” — Instapundit (no video)
Here’s Instapundit’s earlier link; tell me what you see under “WATCH”: http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/02/obama-speech-jeremiah-wright-new-orleans/ (no video)
Nothing personal, I’m sure you’re a fine writer, but I came in to see the evidence, the video. And I don’t like getting my pocket picked by misleading or mislabeled links.
Ah ha! Well I hadn’t seen the Instapundit link. But alas you now have the link to the video from Selma. So it sounds like, after a great deal of dicussion about it, the full story is a click away.
There’s a video there, it’s playing now – but even with my sound system turned all the way up, I can barely hear it. And there’s something else, the video apparently runs for nearly an hour and a half – which about an hour and a half beyond the average voter’s attention span. Maybe the pro-Romney people will figure out how to compress it down to the relevant 30-second commentary. Or… just lose the election. The dolts.
Hey David – there is the neat website called “Google.” When you enter words called “search terms” it looks all over the the “internet” and finds picture and article and videos that match. You may want to try “CSPAN Selma Alabama 2007″ or something like that. It is pretty cool; bet you might use it again after you try this out.
The problem is not confined to this act of opportunism by Obama to convince blacks he is from the same cloth when he is actually different. It is also in the way people react to these stories, on each side, when it comes to the other. It’s not at all pretty. It reinforces the perceptions of malice that each side sees in the other. Until this changes it will be impossible to develop policy that benefits people in pursuit of liberty and equality.
I honestly don’t care anymore. Call me any names you want, I just don’t care anymore.
White people have bent over backwards in this country to make amends for past sins they had no hand in to a people who were never victimized by. We have national discrimination (against white males) as LAW in this country. And all I every see is it getting worse and worse and worse. Black people can now maim and kill white people at will and nothing is done about it. In fact, they go into jail as heros who killed the crackers.
I’m done. I don’t care what it takes – separate us or what, but I’m done with all this BS.
And that – in a nutshell – is what I was worried about before this disaster was ever elected president. All of the progress since the civil rights movement has been undone. We’re about a half of a millimeter from the Klan making a comeback. Things are going to get a lot worse before they get better. They may very well not get better.
Meanwhile, minorities get shafted the worst. All this hoity-toity green energy stuff and overregulation and all the graft and corruption is making the poor poorer.
That’s a really, really expensive free Obama phone.
Lolly,
Obama is a cultural marxist who uses group identity and class warfare to pit people against each other. Instead of labor vs capital, it’s black against white, men against women, man against nature and what have you. Instead of clinging to a group identity of our own, we should stand for individual rights and objective law. The leftist obscene ideas and principles should be fought with beter ideas and principles. It’ll take time, but we shall overcome!
Look, it’s all very interesting. But, anyone who is either a partisan republican or a thinking independent already KNOWS Hussein is a raving racist. So exposing even more evidence does not good, those who defend him will continue to do so out of willful ignorance or their own racism.
What needs to happen in these pages are continued attempts to stiffen Mitten’s backbone to come up with the kind of hard decisions that are needed to bring this country back from the brink. Frankly, I don’t think he will make those decisions, but continuing to point out that the worst president in a century is the worst president in a century really solves nothing.
I think you mean to say Obama is the worst President in the last 100 years, because technically, Obama is the worst President in two centuries (20th & 21st).
I think there is little difference between Obama and Robert Byrd. Both men were racists and both men tried to hide their racism once they were elected to office. Byrd went on to say that he was “sorry” for being a racist, even though at one time as an adult he was a Grand Wizard in the KKK. Obama never, EVER, apologized for his racist remarks like the ones that were released on the video the other day. THAT is the difference, and it’s a telling one. Because I think Obama is STILL a racist and doesn’t see anything wrong with what he said, and that is what should shock most Americans.
Good, I see that the brown shirts of the regime are coming out angry and bitter: it means that we are hitting them where it hurts (i.e. we are not allowing the independent vote to be tricked into a second vote for the totalitarian clown).
Keep on trolling, we keep spreading the truth.
if you’re taking fire, that means you’re close to the target…
Can you imagine if a white candidate was filmed speaking to a crowd with KKK officials in full regalia flanking him or her? Or even if they appeared on the same stage separately? Immediately, they would become unelectable even to the position of dog catcher. However, here we have basically the same thing. But heck, you could find pictures of Obama eating babies and the media would spin it away or fire it down the memory hole.
Well, now feeling enlightened, I didn’t know “suburban” is Harvard Critical Race Theory code for white honkeys who need to share the wealth. Speaking of sharing the wealth, everyone should know the feds tax and spending policies already share the wealth among the states. In 2003, for every dollar the feds received from the District of Columbia’s tax payers, the District of Columbia got 6.59 cents in federal spending, for a net of 5.59 cents in surplus. Not bad for sharing the wealth, although apparently it didn’t help keep the ambassador to Libya alive. Mass. and Ca. received .78 cents back for every dollar sent to Washington: that is, those going broke blue states generously subsidized some red states, provided those red states banned smoking in public and provided abortions on demand. Meanwhile, Miss. got a 1.83, North Dakota a 1.75, and New Mexico a 1.99, and the borders still are not secure. But, now that the war on terror is over California just authorized state driver’s licenses for illegal aliens.
In the neo (“soft type,” as opposed to the Stalinist “hard type”) communist regime we now live under in the US, it is a folly to expect that anything will alter the expected outcome of the November elections.
The neo-communist regime now in power controls:
(i) what is the important (as opposed to the stalinist era commie regime, which controlled all) “news” and set the political “agenda;”
(ii) a big chunk (as opposed to the stalinist era, when the commie party was controlling all) of the “press;”
and finally (and most importantly) when it is absolutely necessary, it counts the votes (as opposed to the stalinist era hard communist regime, when they were always doing it). Thus, it is futile to expect anything else than what is currently widely expected: that the fraud in the WH will be awarded a second term by his handlers.
Romney is just another Dole/McCain “also run” clown. Those expecting anything else from him are in for another big disappointment. The BHO handlers did a marvelous (I grant them this adjective) “Chicago job” in totally assassinating the Tea Party. However, I should also add, the various members of the Tea Party should blame themselves for having allowed that to take place.
It appears to be just another BLT Marxist sermon to me.
Mr. Adams,
You have a very interesting view on the President’s speech today. I say interesting, because I wonder if it is the same view you had in 2007. I got a good laugh from Tucker Carlson last night when he made very similar comments that you are making in this article. I was laughing not at the comments per se but from the revelation that he did a story on his show in 2007 about the President’s comments but for some reason did not make any of the comments he made yesterday.
If I were to read any articles from 2007, would I find any of the same dishonestly and inconsistency that others on the far-right have espoused in 2012?
What the hell are you talking about? Try to make a point.
Carlson didn’t have the entire video in 2007; that was half the story — that the press suppressed the facts about Obama’s racist, hate-filled rant. Please, try to listen for comprehension.
re: rob crawford
The point I was making should have been obvious. Let me simply it for you. Why didn’t Carlson have the same views about the President’s speech in 2007, that he had last night? Also, if I were to look would I find the same inconsistency/dishonestly in the writings of this article’s author?
Furthermore, do you know for a fact that Carlson did not have the entire tape? If he did a segment on HIS show about the speech, isn’t that something he should have obtained first before commenting?
What’s Tucker Carlson got to do with the price of peanuts in Trinidad, Euroweenie?
re: snork
I’m asking if the writer of this article has made the same inconsistent comments as Carlson has on this subject. And if so, why?
Here’s a new gem:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/10/obama-rich-people-are-for-non-violence-they-dont-want-people-taking-their-stuff-video/
Ok, who left the manhole cover off the sewer?
True the Vote! Mr. Adams for head of the FEC! We’ll never lose another election. Unless Ob bum o wins…
I am sick to the core of where this once wonderful country is heading!
Folks, we better get it together, or we are done for! Obama is nothing
but a 1-trick pony! George Soros owns his soul! PLEASE! Nov.6th, think
with your brains and hearts, and do what is morally needed for us to survive!
We ARE in this TOGETHER! I deeply care for my fellow Americans and we ALL
must take our beloved country back! I really feel Mitt Romney is a good and
decent man, and he wants us ALL to share in the opportunities this country
stands for. Have all the men and women who serve to protect us, past and present,
gave their lives for what is happening here and abroad? WE CAN DO THIS!
Romney/Ryan 2012, Nov.6, a NEW DAY & A NEW BEGINNING for us ALL!!! We CAN do
this!! WE MUST do this!! GOD BLESS THE USA!!
I think it would be really funny to do a satire where top democrats( Hillary, Al Gore, Biden, and Reid) are talking in bogus black dialect with Obama doing the worst accents of all- somehow that just seems like it would be hilarious.
Now that the floodgate of Obama’s past speeches have been finally opened, perhaps it is time for someone to obtain the LA Times’ tape(s) of the speech B. Hussein Obama gives for his great friend, Rashid Khalidi
Hey, right along with King Samir “I hate white people – all of them! Every last iota of a cracker, I hate ‘em” Shabazz… gee, that’s not racist.
Racist-In-Chief. 0bama promised to be a “post-racial” President. Instead, he has been the MOST racial president.
Did someone already say this: Im pretty sure Shabazz is Malcolm X’s son.