A NEGATIVE REACTION to Time's People of the Year choices, with some suggested alternatives. I think it was a pretty dull and uninspired choice on Time's part. Ed Morrissey agrees.
UPDATE: Jeff Jarvis observes: "this is one more indication how we are reentering an age of leadership by the very rich . . . should the millions who gave billions after the tsunami have been the cover subjects, perhaps?"
ANOTHER UPDATE: Reader C.J. Burch emails:
I've had my disagreements with Jeff, but he's right about this. Funny, the MSM has become much more pro super-rich folks since the super-rich became movers and shakers in the Demorcatic party. Wonder why?