December 22, 2008
HOLDING RESCUERS liable for injuries. Plus, Why Ohio is better than California. It’s worth noting, of course, that liability for rescuers’ torts is a common-law tradition, along with the lack of any duty to rescue.
HOLDING RESCUERS liable for injuries. Plus, Why Ohio is better than California. It’s worth noting, of course, that liability for rescuers’ torts is a common-law tradition, along with the lack of any duty to rescue.
Posted by Glenn Reynolds at 7:47 am
Ask me about my BlogChildren!
Reg. U.S. Pat. & Tm. Off.

