Of course they ignore the fact that this ideology has been extant for 1500 years. The only thing different is that they first use twitter to proselytize, and then they cut your head off if you resist.

Reason flees emotion. Either one prevails or the other. When zealots are consumed by emotion as manifested in rage, in stridency, in unrestrained passion -- and yes, almost assuredly in hate, perhaps even violence -- you can be confident their ability to reason is beyond reach. So, it is unreasonable to reason with them or to give credence to their arguments. Your rational responses will not convert them. Better to give such intemperance its podium for it will surely repel the uncommitted and probably aid your position as it undermines their own.

I would venture that his donations will not even support a Radio Flyer.

O'Malley was toast before, now he is burnt toast.

O'Malley is expert at erasing all doubt.

Nobody seems to be rushing to apologizing about black LIVERS matter

The internment of Japanese in WWII is a difficult topic. It should be addressed with concern but also with a fair look at the situation.
Many Japanese were not citizens. The immigrants often bragged about the superiority of the mother country and about their loyalty to it. There were Japanese and perhaps even some Nisei in the US who would have preferred that Japan win the war.
When wars were declared and citizens or subjects of a warring party were inside the enemy's country, it was standard to round them up and hold them. It had been standard at times to round them up and kill them.
The US camps were austere but not cruel. I am unaware of any detainee who was executed or even who was killed while escaping. Some died of illness or accidents in the camps. Given the numbers involved, I'm sure there were incidents of misconduct involving camp staff and detainees. Compared to the baselines of historical treatment, the Japanese in the internment camps were treated decently.
Should they have been interned at all? I can make the case both ways. I'm sure racism and xenophobia played a role in the decision but the racism and xenophobia weren't all on the Anglo side.
German and Italian citizens were also interned, though far fewer of them.

You're talking mostly about the Kibei, immigrant Japanese who went back to Japan for their education and were heavily indoctrinated.

Feeling was high against the Japanese on the West Coast because much of the 12th (Philippine) Division came from California and Roosevelt went along with the internments for political reasons (surprise).

George Marshall fought the internments, but went along with them because it gave the intel people a chance to vet those who were infiltrators of the Black Dragon Society, a group which ran the opium trade and the labor camps in Manchuria and infiltrated every country in the Western Hemisphere with a Japanese population.

I think that the clumsy police state manner it was done and the lack of care of the interred people's property that seems most shocking to me.

I'm sorry, I have to tack onto this.
The property of interred people is covered by their wills. Also of cremated people.
You're right that there was a duty, recognized and then abandoned, to guard the property of the interned people. Again, compared to historical baselines, the American treatment of the Japanese internees was better than most, but there was still plenty wrong with it.

Too bad Thomas Nast didn't consider the lynch rope, rather than the donkey, for the symbol for the Demos.

I thought ISIS created climate change.

Since climate is always shifting to some degree and since things keep happening, it's obvious that climate change causes everything to happen which then causes climate change.

So it's just a matter of days before Californians go on a head-chopping, woman-raping rampage?