FALSE. CLAIMS. ACT.

Pro Se may become a neccessity ..

Ain't it strange? Markets work. Even for law schools.

What are you talking about? No "market" "worked." It's a for-profit enterprise of approximately 350 students that was drained of 25 million over 3 years and IS THEREFORE broke.

Fraud works. The owners "could not in good conscience enroll another class while operating expenses exceed revenue [LESS WHAT THEY TOOK]."

This was just a cover to drain funds from the federal government at an average of 143,00 per student.

We don't have a "market." We have a disgusting system whereby "accreditation" gives one the ability to use students as fungible straws through which to launder money from the federal government to her political donors, and Big Business.

What market is that? Are you still laboring under the notion we live in a capitalist society of free markets? WE DO NOT.

Way back in 2006-2009 we nationalized the economy. Did you forget?

I don't know if I learned MORE law during my 6 week bar exam prep course than in the 3 yrs prior to that, but I absolutely learned law MORE EFFICIENTLY during the prep course.

People in private practice could see this coming way back when.

We priced ourselves out of existence. The only surprise is that it took as long as it did.

"...four of the five founders took in millions in profits ..."

which is all it was about anyway.

And the state legislators that greased the deal got their share too, no doubt.

Nothing sad about it [Charleston Law]. There was no demand for more lawyers when it was founded, just demand for more law schools because students were still flooding them with applications. Many said at the time it wasn't needed, it just took longer than expected to fail.

Maybe it's time for "Law" schooling to become a super major. Essentially you major in pre-law then take one more year of only law to finish. A prep for the bar really.