Archive for October, 2011

RUSH LIMBAUGH’S CRISIS OF CONFIDENCE. Plus this, from the comments: “I think the thing that made Rush so popular was his sense of cheerful optimism. Unlike the O’Reillys and Savages of the world, Rush has always been optimistic about the future. I think that the Obama presidency has been such a disaster of Biblical proportions that Rush is no longer optimistic about the future.” I’m still optimistic. But, yeah, I can see that.

DO NOT TRUST CONTENT from the Star Tribune? “If you relied on the article for your knowledge about the case, as I stupidly did, you were poorly served.”

PROF. JACOBSON ON THE POLITICO CAIN HIT:

The story was a legitimate issue for a presidential candidate; we only wish the mainstream media would investigate Obama’s past with half as much enthusiasm.

But there’s a bigger point here, visible only from 35,000 feet.

This is a taste of the medicine the mainstream media, which includes Politico as I have pointed out before, has in store for the eventual Republican nominee.

Whatever the source of the tip, the presentation was rolled out by Politico in a fashion to do maximum damage to Cain. The Sunday release was timed to be all over the media on Monday morning. Jonathan Martin, the lead reporter on the story for Politico, even conducted an ambush interview with Cain shortly after the story broke, receiving a muddled response from Cain.

Yeah, it’s pretty clear what was going on here. It’s true it was pretty much a failure — see Pro Publica’s takedown, even — but let me repeat my question: Would Jonathan Martin, Maggie Haberman, Anna Palmer and Kenneth Vogel have put their names on a similar piece, with no named sources, aimed at Barack Obama? Would Politico have run it? I think we know the answer.

Meanwhile, Roxeanne De Luca has a question for feminists.

Plus, a look back at Politico’s involvement with the Journolist story-coordination scandal.

FIGHTING VIOLENT GANG CRIME with math.

AT AMAZON, a coupon sale.

JOEL KOTKIN: Overpopulation Isn’t The Problem: It’s Too Few Babies. “For the next generation of Chinese leaders, Deng Xiaoping’s rightful concern about overpopulation at the end of the Mao era will shift into a future of eldercare costs, shrinking domestic markets and labor shortages. This scenario is already a reality in Japan and much of the European continent, including Greece, Spain, Portugal, much of Eastern Europe, Scandinavia and Germany. Adults over the age of 65 make up more than 20% of these countries’ populations — compared with 15% in the U.S. — and their numbers could double by 2030, according to researchers Emma Chen and Wendell Cox. In many of these countries, rising debt burdens and shrinking labor markets have already slowed economic growth and suppressed any hope for a major long-term turnaround. The same will happen to even the best-run European economies, just as it has in Japan, whose decades-long growth spurt ended as its workforce began to shrink.”

LOOKING AT Herman Cain as a turnaround artist. He was good at taking once-valuable properties that had been devalued by inept management and making them work again.

WHAT TO DO WITH THE HALLOWEEN CANDY? Eat it.

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: Woman Burns Husband With Cooking Oil: “A woman in Franklin County is charged with domestic violence and aggravated assault after investigators say she threw a pot of cooking oil on her husband. . . . Her husband, Jason Martin, was admitted to Vanderbilt Medical Center Sunday with third degree burns.” But you’ll have to follow the link to see why this was in the Sports section.

JIM TREACHER: ‘I have in my hand a list of Herman Cain accusers…’ “So we don’t know specifically what Herman Cain stands accused of doing wrong, who’s accusing him, or how to verify any of it. Other than that, this is some solid reporting from Politico.”

I repeat my earlier question: Would Jonathan Martin, Maggie Haberman, Anna Palmer and Kenneth Vogel have put their names on a similar piece, with no named sources, aimed at Barack Obama? Would Politico have run it?

UPDATE: Occupy Politico?

ANOTHER UPDATE: Even the folks at Pro Publica — who are certainly not on the right — aren’t buying this:Politico’s story on possible sexual harassment by Herman Cain may be the biggest investigative scoop of the campaign season. But it would be hard to deduce that from the facts as published. . . . It is clear from the story Politico posted Sunday evening that reporters made extensive efforts to figure out what happened. But much of what appeared came from anonymous sources whose knowledge appeared to be second-hand or unspecific.”

Like I said: Would Jonathan Martin, Maggie Haberman, Anna Palmer and Kenneth Vogel have put their names on a similar piece, with no named sources, aimed at Barack Obama? Would Politico have run it?

(Revised to reflect that the Pro Publica folks say that they’re not lefties.)

And reader Frank Glamser emails: “You will note that the attack on Cain came after he assumed the lead in polls just as was the case with Perry.” Are you suggesting that we should question the timing?