ISLAMIC LAW IN NORTHERN NIGERIA has traditionally been on the mellow side. That was changing, but now things seem to be changing back. Part of the reason: “Many early proponents of Shariah feel duped by politicians who rode its popular wave but failed to live by its tenets, enriching themselves and neglecting to improve the lives of ordinary people.” Shocking.

POLL: Does the Second Amendment give individuals a right to arms? So far it’s leaning very hard toward “yes.”

CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER ON BUSH AND STEM CELLS. I disagreed with Bush’s position, but I also thought at the time that it amounted more to sandbagging of pro-lifers than to standing in the way of research, and that still seems to be the case.

“I’M GOING TO MOVE ON.”

THE FROG AND THE scorpion.

CLINTON HQ HOSTAGE SITUATION resolved.

Eric Scheie is googling the hostage taker.

UPDATE: More from Tom Maguire.

ANOTHER UPDATE: More, including video.

REFLECTIONS ON RECOVERING FROM SURGERY from Ilya Somin.

CUTTING GREENHOUSE GASES ON THE CHEAP: Since most of these changes would save money and energy anyway, they — like most practical greenhouse responses — are worth doing whether or not you believe in global warming.

THE DEATH OF ENVIRONMENTALISM? Questions for Ted Nordhaus and Michael Schellenberger (and Newt Gingrich!)

THE TRIAL BAR ON TRIAL: The Wall Street Journal is gloating. I’ll just note that I know a lot of trial lawyers, and their lives and practices don’t have much in common with the high fliers like Dickie Scruggs. They have actual clients that they try to help, as opposed to megabuck litigation factories.

TOTAL TIME SPENT ONLINE: Up 24.3% from last year.

YEP: “Congressional Democrats are reporting a striking change in districts across the country: Voters are shifting their attention away from the Iraq war. . . . One House Democratic aide summed up the challenge for the leadership, and admitted that it may be a smart move for Democrats to focus on the economy since they haven’t been able to deliver on Iraq.”

GADGET HEAVEN: Just got a box from Sony with a teeny-tiny VAIO UX490 PC, in a kit with a bluetooth GPS unit and a bunch of other goodies. It was so small that when I opened the box, I couldn’t figure out which of the small wrapped objects was the actual computer at first. No, I didn’t buy it. I’m reviewing it, along with several other little computers, for Popular Mechanics. I love stuff like this . . .

EDUCATING JOE BIDEN on the Constitution.

COLOR ME UNSURPRISED: “One in five carbon credits issued by the United Nations are going to support clean energy projects that may in fact have helped to increase greenhouse gas emissions, environmental group WWF said on Thursday.”

Okay, actually I’m a bit surprised. Only one in five?

BOMB SCARE at a New Hampshire Clinton campaign office. Hostages taken. “A young woman with a 6-month or 8-month-old infant came rushing into the store just in tears, and she said, ‘You need to call 911. A man has just walked into the Clinton office, opened his coat and showed us a bomb strapped to his chest with duct tape.'” Coverage is live on Fox; CNN is covering a train accident in Chicago.

MORE ON THE DISASTER THAT IS ZIMBABWE, but with what might actually be good news: “Zimbabwe’s neighbors are increasingly worried about spillover violence and economic damage from Robert Mugabe’s self-made war zone.” Given that Zimbabwe’s neighbors don’t seem to care what happens to the people of Zimbabwe, this kind of worry may be the only thing that produces any action.

FEMALE CIRCUMCISION: Now becoming multiculturally correct!

DON’T ASK, DON’T TELL — CNN’s policy on debate questioners!

HARVARD CRIMSON: Repeal the Second Amendment.

Rand Simberg calls it “sophomoric,” adding: “But perhaps it’s forgivable, since it was probably written by actual sophomores.” He also notes that calls for the repeal of the Second Amendment are implicit admissions that the Second Amendment is an actual barrier to gun control. Indeed.

UPDATE: Reader Thomas Baker emails:

I read the article calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment in the Harvard Crimson. While poorly reasoned, it is a huge leap forward in intellectual honesty for the gun control movement as it impliedly acknowledges an individual right.

However, the authors obviously believe that the right was initially thought necessary because of foreign threats. As I’m sure you are aware, the primary purpose of the Second Amendment was to protect the citizenry from tyrannical government here at home. That students at a top university are so ignorant of their nation’s history is disturbing.

I wonder if I currently enjoy any other constitutionally guaranteed rights that the editors of the Harvard Crimson believe I no longer need? I wonder how bold they would be in trying to strip them away after confiscating my firearms? Scary.

To you. They no doubt believe that Harvard grads will be among the strippers, not the stripees. Which I’ll admit is more likely, if the rest of the populace weren’t armed.

I HAVE NOT YET BEGUN to give up.

SAVE THE DEBATE, ditch CNN.

INDIANA JONES with a particle accelerator.

OUCH: “Leopard is the new Vista, and it’s pissing me off.” I haven’t upgraded yet. Maybe I’ll wait a bit longer.

UPDATE: A more positive take.

MORE ON THE CNN PLANT SCANDAL, from the Union Leader. “This is bad journalism.” And read this, too.