TOM FRIEDMAN POINTS OUT A PARADOX:

But next to the meat imported from the U.S. was a tiny asterisk, which warned that it might contain genetically modified organisms — G.M.O.’s.

My initial patriotic instinct was to order the U.S. beef and ask for it “tartare,” just for spite. But then I and my lunch guest just looked at each other and had a good laugh. How quaint! we said. Europeans, out of some romantic rebellion against America and high technology, were shunning U.S.-grown food containing G.M.O.’s — even though there is no scientific evidence that these are harmful. But practically everywhere we went in Davos, Europeans were smoking cigarettes — with their meals, coffee or conversation — even though there is indisputable scientific evidence that smoking can kill you. In fact, I got enough secondhand smoke just dining in Europe last week to make me want to have a chest X-ray.

So pardon me if I don’t take seriously all the Euro-whining about the Bush policies toward Iraq — for one very simple reason: It strikes me as deeply unserious. It’s not that there are no serious arguments to be made against war in Iraq. There are plenty. It’s just that so much of what one hears coming from German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder and French President Jacques Chirac are not serious arguments. They are station identification.

They are not the arguments of people who have really gotten beyond the distorted Arab press and tapped into what young Arabs are saying about their aspirations for democracy and how much they blame Saddam Hussein and his ilk for the poor state of their region. Rather, they are the diplomatic equivalent of smoking cancerous cigarettes while rejecting harmless G.M.O.’s — an assertion of identity by trying to be whatever the Americans are not, regardless of the real interests or stakes.

Or steaks.

WELL, SOMEBODY IS OPTIMISTIC about the future of space travel. . . .

BRENDAN LOY HAS POSTED IMAGES OF NEWSPAPER FRONT PAGES regarding the Columbia crash on his site. It’s interesting to see the differences — and similarities — across the board.

THIS ARTICLE BY LEONARD DAVID of Space.com looks at what will likely happen to the space station as a result of the Columbia crash.

HERE’S MORE ON INDIA’S MOURNING for Kalpana Chawla.

My reaction, echoing a comment I saw on someone’s blog somewhere, is that this is a classic American story: from immigrant to astronaut in one decade. And people are hardly even paying attention to that angle because it just seems, well, normal. Of course you can move here, work hard, and if you’re good enough, become an astronaut! Of course.

WE TALK ABOUT LIABILITY FOR FALLING DEBRIS IN MY SPACE LAW CLASS, but — though there has, in fact, been damage to things on the ground from falling debris before — the issue always seemed somewhat remote. But then there’s this:

NASA is accepting claims from people who say they were injured or their property was damaged by falling Columbia debris.

The space agency is coordinating with the Federal Emergency Management Agency to address claims requiring immediate action, officials said Sunday.

A foot-long metal bracket smashed through the roof of a dentist’s office in Nacogdoches, Texas. A jagged, half-moon-shaped metal piece about 5-feet long landed in a front yard in the town. . . .

An 18-inch piece of what appeared to be duct piping put a dent in the roof of Rice High School in Navarro County. Debris was also found near the pitcher’s mound of the school’s baseball field and track.

At least no one on the ground was hurt.

IT’S A BOY!

PALESTINE, SCHMALESTINE: Reader Adam Edwards emails:

The Shuttle exploded over Palestine. Doesn’t that tragic fact give you pause?Could this just be a terribly ironic coincidence or could God be trying to warn us?

I’ve gotten a lot of email along these lines, most of it less succinct than Mr. Edwards’. But I think readers have it all wrong. First, if you’ll look at the map, you’ll see that the Shuttle actually exploded over “Tennessee Colony” — an obvious warning from God that I, and other members of the Rocky Top Brigade will soon take over the Blogosphere. It was also over Frankston, thus providing an obvious warning (especially in connection with “Tennessee Colony”) that Chirac’s neocolonialist efforts are doomed. Or maybe it was over “Nineveh” — an obvious sign from God that we should support the Assyrian people’s desire for freedom in the face of Muslim tyranny. (Don’t believe me? Visit this website — Nineveh.com – and see for yourself. Note the prominent mention of Columbia and the fervent pro-Americanism.) Coincidence? I think not. It’s a sign from God!

But seriously, the real meaning of the Shuttle exploding above Palestine is obvious, and it’s directed to Yasser Arafat: If you don’t want all kinds of high-tech exploding American stuff to come down on you, you’d better get on the right side of history before it’s too late.

It’s a message from God, Yasser. Put down those baby wipes, and think about it.

PUNDITWATCH IS UP! NASA Administrator Sean O’Keefe gets high marks.

SMOKING GUN? HELL, WE’VE GOT THE WHOLE GUNMAN!

SADDAM Hussein’s senior bodyguard has fled with details of Iraq’s secret arsenal.

His revelations have supported US President George W. Bush’s claim there is enough evidence from UN inspectors to justify going to war.

Abu Hamdi Mahmoud has provided Israeli intelligence with a list of sites that the inspectors have not visited.

They include:

AN underground chemical weapons facility at the southern end of the Jadray Peninsula in Baghdad;

A SCUD assembly area near Ramadi. The missiles come from North Korea;

TWO underground bunkers in Iraq’s Western Desert. These contain biological weapons.

William Tierney, a former UN weapons inspector who has continued to gather information on Saddam’s arsenal, said Mahmoud’s information is “the smoking gun”.

You’d think this would be getting more attention.

UPDATE: Several readers pointed out the similarities between the above account and this one from Debka dated January 21. Given that the bodyguard’s name is a pseudonym, it could be the same guy — though he explicitly mentions Hamdi Mamoud / Hamouda in this interview. Of course, that could be a red herring, too.

Conclusion? Beats me. The reason we’re not hearing more about this could be because it’s not true — which is always the way to bet when you don’t know any more — or it could be because, well, it is and it’s not time yet. Stay tuned. And if you’ve got any other leads on this story, let me know.

WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? Here’s some Congressional testimony of mine from about ten years ago on how to move away from a bureaucratic model and toward a more market-oriented approach to space. Much of it, sadly, remains timely.

THIS STORY REPORTS A “CRUSHING DEFEAT” FOR GERHARD SCHROEDER:

The conservative Christian Democrats won 48 percent of the vote in Schroeder’s home state of Lower Saxony, gaining 12 points over the last election five years ago to wrest the statehouse from the Social Democrats, exit polls and early returns compiled for ARD national television showed. The Social Democrats were at 33 percent, down from nearly 48 percent last time.

In Hesse state, the data showed the Christian Democrats surging to 50 percent from 39 percent in 1999, with the Social Democrats slumping to 27 percent from 39 percent. The boost in support left the Christian Democrats poised to drop a centrist coalition ally and govern the state alone.

The story says that it was economics, not his anti-American stance, that hurt him. I wonder, though. At the very least, it demonstrates that his anti-American positions were not a sufficient distraction.

ROBERT SAWYER confirms the story of a Canadian Broadcasting Company interviewer who asked him about American “arrogance,” but says that we shouldn’t be too hard on her:

The interviewer (I’m sorry, but I don’t know her name, or even

what city she was in — Newsworld does production across Canada;

I’ve been on Newsworld many times, but never had been interviewed

by this woman) did indeed ask me a question related to whether

this was a terrorist attack, and whether it had been arrogant of

the Americans to launch a shuttle now. The idea that it was

terrorism hadn’t even occurred to me — it looked like a tragic

accident, and I was reliving my memories of when CHALLENGER had

blown up all those years ago. So, the question took me by

surprise.

In any event, I told her no, it wasn’t arrogance, and added that

the Bush administration had very much had a business-as-usual

policy post-September 11; I can’t remember exactly how I phrased

it, but my thought was that if you let terrorists freeze you into

doing nothing out of fear, they’ve won. I wish I remembered her

exact words better, and my own, but, like everyone else I was in

shock.

I’m sure she didn’t mean to be offensive, and it was quite clear

during our brief interview that she was being distracted by all

sorts of chatter in her earpiece (she first introduced me as

Robert Fischer, who is a staff reporter the CBC).

Well, I don’t know if that lets her off the hook, or just means that her guard was down and her prejudices were showing. You can decide that for yourself.

UPDATE: Arthur Silber has some thoughts on charges of “arrogance.”

GRIEVE, AND MOVE ON: A lot of people seem to have missed the link I put in below, so here’s a pointer to my lengthy sum-up post on Columbia over at GlennReynolds.com.

A PREVIOUSLY-SCHEDULED CARGO ROCKET has launched for the Space Station.

SMOKING GUNS: Already the “advance warning” stories are coming out: Here’s one in the Washington Post and here’s one in the Boston Herald. But these kind of miss the point: everyone who knew anything about the Shuttle knew it was dangerous — among my space-community friends, the estimate was that it would average one crash out of fifty launches. (Believing that, most of us would have gone anyway — I would.)

Like so many things, the press will focus on the short-term, looking for “whistleblowers” and “smoking gun” memos. But the real problem goes back to the original design decisions for the Shuttle, made in the early 1970s, in which the desire to save a few billion dollars up front imposed long term costs, and dangers, on the nation down the line.

UPDATE: Tim Blair notes that various idiots are already trying to make political hay.

WILLIAM SJOSTROM reports that traditionally anti-American columnist Julie Burchill has decided to weigh in in favor of war with Iraq — and in The Guardian, no less. Excerpt:

The new enemies of America, and of the west in general, believe that these countries promote too much autonomy, freedom and justice. They are the opposite of socialism even more than they are the opposite of capitalism. They are against light, love, life – and to attempt to pass them the baton of enlightenment borne by the likes of Mandela and Guevara is woefully to misunderstand the nature and desires of what Christopher Hitchens (a life-long man of the left) described as “Islamo-fascism”.

When you look back at the common sense and progressiveness of arguments against American intervention in Vietnam, Chile and the like, you can’t help but be struck by the sheer befuddled babyishness of the pro-Saddam apologists.

She then proceeds to demolish the standard lefty arguments against war (“it’s all about oil,” etc.). As Sjostrom notes: “This is simply a massive admission from a figure on the British left. For Americans, imagine if Ramsey Clark admitted that the war might be a good idea.”

UPDATE: Then there’s this, in today’s Observer:

Bosnia and Rwanda made the case for action, because inaction was far worse and its consequences were morally intolerable. In the former, the West (rarely acting in concert) took the course of diplomacy backed up by the incredible threat of mild force. The Yugoslavian situation was deemed to be too complicated and too dangerous to resolve by firm action. Didn’t they all just enjoy killing each other?

There were sanctions, international mediations, peace brokers shuttled hither and yon arranging ceasefires that were broken, usually by the Bosnian Serbs. The United Nations Security Council declared six safe areas for Bosnian Muslims to be protected by lightly equipped UN troops. One of these was Srebrenica.

On 11 July 1995, almost in slow motion, we watched the Serbs enter the safe haven, disarm the Dutch protectors and separate the men and boys from women and small children. And as I saw General Ratko Mladic pacifying a crying Muslim woman, I think I knew, as he certainly did, what was going to happen to her husband or son.

A year earlier, on another continent, we had again looked on while one of the peoples of a sovereign nation, Rwanda, slaughtered another in their hundreds of thousands. Once more, a small UN force was brushed aside in the early stages. Intervention was never seriously considered.

If leaders must take responsibility for these terrible failures, then so must those who always urge inaction. Over Bosnia, Kosovo and over Afghanistan, voices on both the Left and Right have been consistently raised to object to the use of force. Where these voices have belonged to pacifists, they have my respect, but most often they have belonged to the purely selfish, the pathologically timid, or to those who somehow believed that however bad things were in Country X, the Americans were always worse.

It may be too much to hope for, but I think the intellectual and moral bankruptcy of the anti-American left is beginning to sink in.

TODD RUNDGREN: NOSTALGIA ACT. I went to see Rundgren last night at the historic Tennessee Theater. It was a solo show — not “unplugged” as he had a lot of tapes, sequenced stuff, etc. going, but no other musicians. I had a front-row seat. He’s not one of my favorites, but I’ve always respected him. Not last night. He very obviously didn’t care about the audience, barely went through the motions (he hit wrong notes on every song on which he played instruments) and generally put on the worst show I’ve ever seen by a professional musician.

And most people didn’t care. The crowd was a bunch of aging boomers, around ten years older than me on average. They were on an obvious nostalgia trip, and rushed the stage for autographs afterward (he gave out one or two, shook a couple of hands, then fled). I’m glad they had a good time, but I regarded it as a wasted evening. I sat with two other musicians — one of whom had seen Rundgren play the same venue 30 years ago along with Free, Montrose, and Alice Cooper (it was a better show, he said) — and they were equally disappointed. Still, with around 1,000 people there, and tickets at 25 bucks a piece, he probably walked away with $10-15,000 for about an hour’s work.

Nice for him, but I won’t go to see him again. And it’s sad to see someone perform when they’d clearly rather be doing anything else.

SORRY FOR THE HIATUS: I went to see Todd Rundgren (bad choice; more on that later). Meanwhile, here’s Mark Steyn:

Nonetheless, this will not be as traumatisingly mesmeric as the Challenger disaster. The yellow-ribbon era died with September 11: even if their television networks haven’t quite adjusted, Americans are tougher about these things; this is a country at war and one that understands how to absorb losses and setbacks.

What happened happened most likely because the Columbia was just so damn old and rusty. If anything, it symbolises not American “arrogance”, but what happens when the great youthful innovative spirit of the country is allowed to atrophy: the entire space programme is now dependent on a transit system a generation old. If Mr Bush really wanted to emphasise the gulf between his country and both the Islamist cave dwellers and “Old Europe”, he would announce a major renewal of the space project. A frontier is part of the US character.

For me, the saddest moment was during after-concert beers at the Old College Inn, when I heard a twentyish undergraduate wonder “do you think we’ll see a mission to Mars in our lifetimes?”

When I was 20, I didn’t wonder. But now, in my dark moments, I do.

See you tomorrow.

CRITICS OF THE APOLLO PROGRAM used to talk sneeringly about “the ghetto and the moon.” So it’s worth reposting this picture of the Moon, drawn by a teenaged boy in a Polish ghetto during the Holocaust.

The Nazi scum over at Vanguard News Network — like the Iraqis quoted in the story below — are happy about this. That says it all. I won’t link to them, though: I have some standards.

But as they, and their Iraqi comrades, rejoice about the death of the Israeli astronaut who carried this picture into space with him, the rest of us know that they’d be shitting in their pants if they ever met an actual Israeli soldier in person.

That says it all, too.

DAVID PINTO attended the Columbia launch, and knew astronaut Dave Brown. He’s posted his thoughts in a rare non-baseball entry on his blog.

UPDATE: I’ve got a lengthy “what it all means” post over at GlennReynolds.com if you can stand to read more from me.

THERE’S STREAMING VIDEO of the Shuttle break-up, a roundup of what’s known now, and lots of links to other information, here.

THIS is a tragedy, too. What makes the Columbia‘s loss more striking than the deaths of train passengers is that space exploration is forward-looking, not just part of ordinary life, and such a loss is a setback to something important, and noble. It’s not that astronauts’ lives are worth more than those of anyone else; it’s what they do, and what it stands for.

WORTHWHILE CANADIAN EMAIL:

I was very sorry to hear about the loss of the Columbia crew this morning. My family and I have great admiration for the strength and courage of the American

people. You are leaders in all of the things that are worth leading in. I know that no matter how difficult it is to deal with a tragedy of this magnitude, Americans are up to it. If history is a guide, America will respond with grief, but also with determination and intelligence.

I am proud to be a friend of the United States. I sincerely hope that the large majority of Canadians share my feelings today, not those of the CBC reporter you cited.

Patrick Brown

London, Canada

So do I. And thanks. Canada, of course, has been a fine partner in space activity — going far beyond the famous robot arm on the Shuttle.

FROM A STORY BY MARCIA DUNN, datelined 8:28 a.m. today:

Some of Columbia’s crew members didn’t want their time in space to end.

“Do we really have to come back?” astronaut David Brown jokingly asked Mission Control before the ride home.

(Via Jesse Walker).

WILLIAM GIBSON WRITES:

The Monogram Space Taxi was a particular favorite, and I kept the space-suited figures long after the taxi itself had broken up and vanished.

Broken up and vanished. In the sky over Nacogdoches County. And I’m sad all the way back to the little boy with his stiff black book and his Bonestell rockets.

But Willy was right, and nobody ever said it would be risk-free.

If it were, it wouldn’t be glorious.

And it’s only with these losses that we best know that it really is.

Read the whole thing.

THE ANGRY CLAM has posted Robert Heinlein’s The Green Hills of Earth — here’s an excerpt:

We pray for one last landing

On the globe that gave us birth;

Let us rest our eyes on the fleecy skies

And the cool, green hills of Earth.

Amen.

TRENT TELENKO has a series of updates on Columbia in this post.

And Jay Manifold, naturally, has lots of posts.

DAN HANSON WRITES the speech he thinks President Bush should have given.

THE IRAQIS ARE HAPPY about the Columbia crash. Of course, the only rockets they build are designed to lob anthrax at Tel Aviv.

I’M WATCHING THE NEWS CONFERENCE, and it looks like a zipper effect followed by burnthrough and structural damage, leading to the loss of the left wing. They’re reporting anomalous heat sensor readings, loss of tire pressure in the main gear on that side, and so on.

The shuttle can tolerate the loss of a tile or two. But when the integrity of the tile cover is breached, tiles can be pulled off one after another — hence the term “zipper effect.” Then enough heat can penetrate through in sufficient quantity to destroy or weaken what’s underneath. This is a well-understood possibility, so expect a quick resolution (by the standards of these kinds of things) if the evidence continues to point this way.

Best NASA line from the press conference so far: “We’ll find it and we’ll fix it.”

DALE AMON HAS MULTIPLE POSTS over on Samizdata, and they’re all worth reading. So is this this one from Stephen Green.

HERE’S THE COMPLETE TEXT of President Bush’s speech to the nation.

SKBUBBA says look at the software, as either a source of error or, conceivably, sabotage.

HERE’S A NOTE ON THE FLIGHT that seems particularly poignant now.

JOHN MOORE has saved and mirrored a copy of the NEXRAD loop. Note the interesting star-shaped pattern at the beginning. For some reason, my IE only wants to save this stuff as a bitmap file — any idea what’s up with that?

OKAY, I’m taking my daughter to the mall. Back later. Check out “>this NEXRAD loop showing the debris field and — I think — heavier debris falling at the beginning. I can’t seem to save this animated loop. If anyone can, please do. I assume they’re saving it, but you never know.

Via phone, my mother just reported that William Burrows (on NBC) called Congress an “unindicted co-conspirator” for its bad policy and budgetary neglect. That’s about right. Meanwhile Defense Tech asks what happens to the Space Station crew. And Virginia Postrel has local reports, and a link to local TV’s coverage on streaming video, which she says is quite good.

SPACE SHUTTLE COLUMBIA is out of communication and lost from radar. It should have landed three minutes ago. At this point, it can only be presumed to have been lost on reentry. CNN has photos of it above Dallas, with no obvious problems.

Is there a connection with the presence of an Israeli astronaut? Probably not, but who knows?

UPDATE: Just saw CNN play the video from Dallas — I was going earlier on something they had said that I guess I misunderstood — and it looks as if it shows the Shuttle breaking up. A single trail breaks up into multiple vapor trails as it moves. They’re gone. May they rest in peace.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Here’s the CNN.com report. People have phoned CNN to report a “loud impact.”

Here’s Spaceflight Now’s real-time update page. At the moment it notes rather optimistically that search and rescue forces are being deployed.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Now, more realistically, NASA is asking people to stay away from any debris that they find, as they may be hazardous.

“At least they got to go into space,” observes my daughter. Well, yeah. It still sucks, though.

MORE: Why it’s probably not terrorism: (1) if you planted a bomb, you’d want it to go off on takeoff — that’s when everyone is watching, and there’s less time for stuff to go wrong, since you’d have to wonder whether a bomb would work after spending an extended time in space; (2) it’s basically impossible to shoot down a reentering space shuttle because of its speed and altitude; (3) there are so many things that can go wrong with shuttles, especially Columbia, which is the oldest, without invoking terrorism. I suppose it’s conceivable that a saboteur did some sort of subtle structural damage calculated to cause this sort of a failure while remaining unnoticed during ground checks, but that strikes me as unlikely for a variety of reasons.

From the video it looks like structural failure, followed by an explosion as the spacecraft disintegrated. That’s unlikely to be the result of sabotage. Most likely it was failure in a wing spar or some other component, probably brought on by age and fatigue, though possibly caused by tile zippering and burn-through, or damage on launch. We’ll see. No point getting ahead of things here, but plenty of reason to think it’s not terrorism.

Prediction: This won’t traumatize people the way Challenger did because (1) it’s not the first time; and (2) we’re at war now, and people’s calculations of such things — especially post-WTC — are different. I hope, however, that we’ll look at moving beyond the elderly and unreliable Shuttle now.

ANOTHER UPDATE: A woman from Huntington, Texas is reporting lots of debris and a “burning rubber” smell, after hearing a rumbling sound at about 9:15. Debris is reported, via police scanners, in Jasper and Moffett counties, too.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Boy, that didn’t take long. Reportedly, a Canadian Broadcasting Company interviewer has blamed “American Arrogance” for the crash. Follow the link for more information, and a link to the CBC Ombudsman. I’ll let you know if I find out more on this.

MORE: President Bush will be addressing the nation.

YET ANOTHER UPDATE: Here’s a link to live streaming video from MSNBC.com.

Meanwhile ModerateLeft responds to the reported charge of “arrogance:”

Well, if this is arrogance–exploring space for science, pushing the envelope of the human experience, doing what our species has always done–then I support it. If it is arrogant to want to learn, we are arrogant. If it is arrogant to want to explore, we are arrogant. If it is arrogant to risk our lives for the possibility of a better future for all mankind, we are arrogant.

Mankind is arrogant. We believe foolish things–that we may one day cure cancer, that we may one day develop new forms of energy, that we may one day walk on Mars. We believe these foolish things, and we dedicate ourselves to achieving them. How ridiculous. How arrogant.

And people die for these things. And people are injured for life. The astronauts of Apollo 1, and the Challenger, and now, sadly, the Columbia have died for the arrogant belief that we can be more than we are, that we can walk on the moon, that we can touch the stars.

So call us arrogant for building the space shuttle. Call the men and woman who gave their lives today arrogant for believing they could fly to space and return to tell about it. But don’t call us wrong. For this arrogance defines humanity. And I would rather our species be arrogant than afraid.

And that last is the sentiment that the critics can’t understand.

UPDATE: Here, via The Corner, is Reagan’s Challenger speech. And here is the text of the speech written by William Safire for Richard Nixon, in the event the Apollo XI crew was lost:

Fate has ordained that the men who went to the moon to explore in peace will stay on the moon to rest in peace.

These brave men, Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin, know that there is no hope for their recovery. But they also know that there is hope for mankind in their sacrifice.

These two men are laying down their lives in mankind’s most noble goal: the search for truth and understanding.

They will be mourned by their families and friends; they will be mourned by their nation; they will be mourned by the people of the world; they will be mourned by a Mother earth that dared send two of her sons into the unknown.

In their exploration, they stirred the people of the world to feel as one; in their sacrifice, they bind more tightly the brotherhood of man.

In ancient days, men looked at stars and saw their heroes in the constellations. In modern times, we do much the same, but our heroes are epic men of flesh and blood.

Others will follow, and surely find their way home. Man’s search will not be denied. But these men were the first, and they will remain the foremost in our hearts.

For every human being who looks up at the moon in the nights to come will know that there is some corner of another world that is forever mankind.

I got it here, but the site loads slowly enough that I doubted it could handle the traffic from a simple link. Here’s another in case that one is dead.

MORE: Rand Simberg has some useful observations. Excerpt:

The entire NASA budget is now in a cocked hat, because we don’t know what the implications are until we know what happened. But it could mean an acceleration of the Orbital Space Plane program (I sincerely hope not, because I believe that this is entirely the wrong direction for the nation, and in fact a step backwards). What I hope that it means is an opportunity for some new and innovative ideas–not techically, but programmatically.

Once again, it demonstrates the fragility of our space transportation infrastructure, and the continuing folly of relying on a single means of getting people into space, and doing it so seldom. Until we increase our activity levels by orders of magnitude, we will continue to operate every flight as an experiment, and we will continue to spend hundreds of millions per flight, and we will continue to find it difficult to justify what we’re doing. We need to open up our thinking to radically new ways, both technically and institutionally, of approaching this new frontier.

I had actually been invited to the Monday teleconference on the new NASA budget, but I imagine that’s off now. Rand also has some useful speculation (which he’s careful to label as such) about what might have gone wrong.

Meanwhile, the Times of India is proud of Indian-born astronaut Kalpana Chawla:

Kalpana Chawla, who is feared to have perished in the Columbia space shuttle mishap along with six others, had done India proud when she embarked on her first space mission on November 19, 1997.

The Karnal-born Chawla, the first Indian American astronaut, began her career at the Ames Research Center at Nasa in 1988.

A graduate in aeronautical engineering from the Punjab Engineering College she began work at the Ames in the area of fluid dynamics.

They should be proud. Ilan Ramon’s presence has gotten more attention, but Chawla’s presence is more representative.

MORE: Jim Flowers is setting up a blog (metablog?) that will track blogosphere coverage of the Columbia loss.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Canadian reader Peter Ash emails:

As a Canadian, I sincerely hope that no one in the States draws the conclusion that other Canadians share the bad attitude (and exceptionally poor taste) of the journalist you cited. Trust me, I’ll be looking for verification that what was implied was in fact implied, which will be followed by an acidic letter or twenty to the appropriate parties.

I still remember where I was when Challenger happened (I was in grade four, no less). Several Canadian astronauts have ridden the Shuttle, and right now Canadians are feeling the pain with their cousins to the south. If you would, please do convey to your readers that the overwhelming majority of us feel as awful about this as all of you do.

On the technical side, you’re right. The Shuttle is too old and rather poorly designed. In some ways it’s surprising that this hasn’t happened before. They’re not going to get much out of the crash debris, the re-entry forces will have reduced most of it to charred lumps. Look for replays on the launch footage, and focus on the piece of insulation that fell of the External Tank and allegedly hit the left wing. There will probably be an inquiry as to why more wasn’t done to check on the integrity of the wing before the space shuttle was allowed to re-enter. After all, if closer inspections revealed trouble, awkward as it would be, the Shuttle could have been left up in orbit until such time as another Shuttle, or a Russian Soyuz module, could have been sent up to bring down the crew.

Indeed, there could have been repairs made in space if need be, with the Shuttle eventually brought down by a skeleton crew or perhaps even on automation.

This is going to be somewhat problematic for the current occupants of the Space Station. NASA might have to pay the Russians to use one of their modules to bring them down, since they’re likely going to ground the Shuttle fleet for a year or two. Oh, and obviously, look for that renewed initiative to send another teacher into space to quietly disappear. And given that NASA’s only other two space tragedies (the Apollo fire and the Challenger disaster) occurred in late January, I would expect that there won’t be any more late January/early February flights again for a long time. Not that the NASA scientists are suspicious, but the pilots who fly their Shuttles just might be.

All interesting. And, I should stress, we don’t take the all-too-frequently anti-American twits of the CBC to represent general sentiment among Canadians. And I presume that if the reports about that remark are false, that will show up when the CBC ombudsman replies, or when transcripts appear. But I have no reason to doubt the report at the moment. LATER: Fraters Libertas blogs more mean Canadian comments — from C-SPAN, this time.

MORE: A reader sends this link to a NOAA radar image that seems to show the debris trail. I don’t know what else that long orange streak could be. LATER: I’m watching MSNBC, which says the streak is debris. STILL LATER: I should note that the plume looks so big and dense because it’s full of vaporized/powdered aluminum and other metals, which will register far more strongly on weathe radar than the water vapor it’s designed to measure. I mention this at the behest of several readers, in the vain hope of heading off conspiracy theorists.

ANOTHER UPDATE: It’s a big deal in India, but not in France:

Just thought you might be interested in knowing that none of the major French channels (TF1, A2, FR3, M6) have, as of this moment, even bothered to interrupt programming to announce the Columbia news. I live in Switzerland and have been zapping back and forth between CNN, MSNBC, BBC and various Swiss, German and French channels. The French apparently haven’t noticed yet (or don’t care?)

Best regards from Lausanne,

James Wade

Hmm. That’s representative, too. LATER: Bill from MerdeinFrance emails:

I’m definitely not one to defend the French but with regards to French news coverage of this disaster it is true that LCI TV (owned by TF1), 24 hour French language news available only to cable viewers, has covered this non-stop since the story broke. Other channnels, it is true, have not broken for any coverage.

So there you are. It’s also showing up on the websites for many French TV stations and newspapers.

MORE: Here is a report of debris on the ground. Excerpt:

NACOGDOCHES, Texas (AP) — Residents said debris, including bits of machinery and pieces of metal, were found strewn across the city Saturday morning, hours after NASA lost contact with space shuttle Columbia.

“It’s all over Nacogdoches,” said James Milford, owner of Milford Barber shop in downtown Nacogdoches. “There are several little pieces, some parts of machinery … there’s been a lot of pieces about 3 feet wide.”

There’s a photo, which doesn’t look very impressive. But then debris isn’t, usually.

David Janes has lots of links, including one that led me to this piece by Doc Searls on the Challenger tragedy, which is still very much worth reading.

Okay, I’m closing out this post. New developments will be reported above.

IS OLIVER WILLIS CHANNELING STEVEN DEN BESTE? Well, not exactly, but he has posted an uncharacteristically long and thoughtful essay.

I’m still on my first cup of coffee, so I’m not going to respond at length. But I will note that Oliver suggests that Bush has “goaded” America into war. As I’ve noted before, though, this is the slowest rush to war we’ve ever seen. And wasn’t it considered heroic executive leadership when FDR “goaded” the country into war?

HERE’S A GARY HART PROFILE from the New York Times:

”Walter Mondale can just go away,” Hart says. ”John Glenn can go away. Michael Dukakis can go away. I can’t just go away.”

”Why?” asks his wife, Lee, who is sitting at the kitchen island. She has been married to him for 44 years, and yet she seems to ask this not for my benefit, but because it is a question she would genuinely like to have answered.

”I don’t know,” Hart says, shaking his head. He thinks, then repeats himself. ”I don’t know. I don’t know.

”Let me answer you with a question,” Hart tells me finally, although I wasn’t the one who asked the question to begin with. ”If I weren’t thinking about doing this” — that is, running again — ”would you be here right now?”

I allow that I probably wouldn’t.

”Well,” he says, spreading his arms triumphantly. ”There are only two places to be in American life — on the sidelines or on the playing field. I don’t need to run for president. But I do want to be heard.”

I think that Hart should get a blog. He’d be great at it.

THE JOHN LOTT / MARY ROSH STORY has made the Washington Post. Excerpt:

Sanchez is a blogger — someone who maintains a Web site where they report and comment on the news — who had been tracking the debate between Lott and critics of his gun research. He became suspicious about Rosh after he noticed that several of Rosh’s online defenses of Lott seemed to track closely with arguments the scholar himself had made in private e-mails to Sanchez and other bloggers. He tracked Mary Rosh’s IP address (the computer code translation of the standard e-mail address) to Pennsylvania. . . .

Lott said he initially used his own name in online debates with critics. “But you just get into really emotional things with people. You also run into other problems.” So he started using the name Mary Rosh. “I should not have done it, there is no doubt. But it was a way to get information into the debate.”

Another story broken by a blogger.

OVER A YEAR AGO, I called stuff like this “pure political poison” in terms of our relations with the Muslim world. It still is.

UPDATE: A lot of readers disagree with me here, pointing out that Nazism has a lot of adherents in the Arab world, etc., etc. That’s certainly true, but I don’t think it really addresses the point. Justin Katz writes that efforts to compare this with A.N.S.W.E.R. suggest “desperation” on the part of liberals. Well, that’s right. For it to compare with A.N.S.W.E.R., it would have to be a pro-Nazi sticker, sold by organizers who proudly shared its sentiments.

VENEZUELANS ARE MARCHING FOR PRESS FREEDOM in response to Hugo Chavez’s effort to shut down opposition TV stations.

IT’S NOT ABOUT THE OOOIIILLL — IT’S ABOUT THE ALIENS!

It is allegedly said that the craft crashed during the Gulf War (1990-1991), or more recently (probably in December 1998). This became some kind of Iraq’s Rosewell. The USA is currently reverse-engineering the Rosewell craft and fears that Saddam’s scientists may become even more successful than Americans in this or that sphere. It was said that these researches may give Iraq a considerable advance and even make it a leading super power.

UFO Roungup’s Arab journalists failed either to confirm or to deny these rumors.

Silly me, I thought it was about the antigravity. I’ll see if I can “roungup” some more news on this subject.

JUST RAN ACROSS CAROL JOHNSON’S open letter to her party, the Democrats:

I am a dyed-in-the-wool Republican-hater, coming from a long line of Democratic Party supporters, and YOU ARE LOSING ME. I am a white, not-quite-40 mother of three who lives in the suburbs, and YOU ARE LOSING ME. I care about Education, Social Welfare, and the Environment, and YOU ARE LOSING ME.

The war is involved.

UPDATE: And here’s one they’ve already lost.

GO EAST, UNCLE SAM: Here’s more evidence, from Sofia Sideshow.

MATTHEW YGLESIAS is back from hiatus.

“GERMANS GUILTY IN IRAQ SUPERGUN CASE:”

A court in the German city of Mannheim has convicted two businessmen of supplying weapons-making equipment to Iraq in violation of UN sanctions.

Engineer Bernd Schompeter was sentenced to five years and three months for dealing in drills that can be used for boring tubes for long-range cannons, capable of launching nuclear, chemical or biological warheads.

At a guess, this is the tip of the iceberg.

I’M WATCHING PHIL DONAHUE AND NEAL BOORTZ ON MSNBC NOW — and it’s obvious why Boortz has Donahue beat hollow in ratings. Donahue keeps accusing Boortz of being “thunderous,” but Donahue’s critique is idea-free and sneering, while Boortz is talking about actual ideas. “Why does Donahue have a show?” asks my wife.

Beats me.

JACOB T. LEVY WRITES IN THE NEW REPUBLIC:

In its dollar magnitude, it’s almost certainly the biggest case of financial mismanagement in U.S. history. While a final tally is years away, in part because of suspiciously lost or missing documents, there’s good reason to think that the dollar figures will dwarf WorldCom’s $9 billion. It’s a scandal that crosses partisan lines and reaches into high levels of both the Clinton and the Bush administrations. And it’s got nothing to do with Wall Street. . . .

And yet, thanks to a combination of convoluted detail, media bias, and ideological blindness, most Americans have never even heard about it.

Wonder why Howell Raines hasn’t made it a priority?

IS BLOGGING VOLUME AN economic indicator? Well, there do seem to be a lot of unemployed bloggers. . . .

YOU’LL NOTICE YOU NEVER SEE RUMSFELD AND STRYKER PHOTOGRAPHED TOGETHER.

RAND SIMBERG has published a glossary that will help in decoding New York Times editorials and the like. Excerpt:

“going it alone”:

Meaning 1: Taking action in concert with numerous European and Middle Eastern nations, and others around the globe, but without France and Germany.

Read the whole thing.

RACHEL LUCAS says that Nelson Mandela has exhausted his moral capital.

Well, his intellectual capital has certainly run dry.

MATERIAL BREACH (AGAIN) — the United States will release intercepted Iraqi communications that show deliberate deception. My prediction: they will be denounced as fakes by Saddam and his supporters.

HERE’S MORE ON THE DEMISE OF BROBECK, PHLEGER — a law firm that fell victim to the dot-com bust. Well, sort of.

AT LEAST THEY’RE NOT ALGERIANS, THIS TIME:

NAPLES (Reuters) – Italian police have arrested 28 Pakistani men suspected of links to al Qaeda in one of the biggest anti-terrorism operations Italy has seen since the September 11 attacks on the United States.

Military police burst into an apartment in central Naples on Wednesday night as part of a routine sweep against illegal immigration and ended up discovering enough explosives to blow up a three-story building, officials said on Friday.

They arrested all 28 men staying in the apartment after finding 800 grams (28 ounces) of explosives, 230 feet of fuse and various electronic detonators crammed behind a false wall.

Islamic religious texts, photos of “jihad” (holy war) martyrs, piles of false documents, maps of the Naples area, addresses of contacts around the world and more than 100 mobile telephones were also found in the run-down lodgings, police said.

A judicial source said the maps had various targets marked out on them including the headquarters of NATO’s southern European command, the U.S. consulate in Naples and a U.S. naval base at Capodichino, just outside the port city.

As Austin Bay has already pointed out, the war buildup isn’t “distracting” from the hunt for Al Qaeda. It’s flushing Al Qaeda from its holes, and making its operatives easier to catch.

DAVE WINER: “AOL was the finger in the dyke of the Internet.”

Nope, not going there.

BUSH’S REAL MOTIVE FOR GOING TO WAR: Revealed at last!

MORE ON THIS WEEK IN DIPLOMACY, over at GlennReynolds.com — and Frank Sinatra makes a guest appearance. Well, sort of.

GUNS FOR TOTS: Dr. Manhattan points to a charity drive in New York that’s worth getting behind.

LESSONS FROM THE RICHARD REID PROSECUTION: TalkLeft notes:

The lesson is this: Our federal courts and our criminal justice system are well equipped to handle terror cases. There is no need to keep the suspects in military custody, cut off from lawyers –or to try them in secret military tribunals. Reid pleaded guilty to all counts and received no promises of leniency or other sentence concessions. Reid had excellent appointed counsel and a U.S. District Court Judge presiding over his case. The proceedings were open to the media and public. Important court filings by both the Prosecution and the Defense were available on the Internet. The Government got the conviction and the life sentence it sought.

For terrorists of the Richard Reid variety, I think this is right. I think, though, that it’s perfectly appropriate to deal with terrorists who are still an active threat via, say, Hellfire missiles.

GOODBYE TO “OLD EUROPE?” Here’s a report that there’s talk about U.S. bases moving from Germany to Poland. The information isn’t enormously solid, but it’s interesting that such rumors are spreading — and they may, themselves, be part of the diplomatic campaign.

ACCORDING TO A source who will remain undisclosed, the White House is emailing out Andrew Sullivan’s “Fisking” of the New York Times’ war coverage to rather a lot of journalists. Heh.

AIRBRUSH AWARD: Look at what Daimler-Chrysler did to this famous Bill Mauldin cartoon. Jeez. I blame the Germans.

“AXIS OF WEASELS” UPDATE: Now it’s in The Economist.

Last week, Germany sandbagged the secretary of state when it said it would not vote for war on Iraq at any price. The French foreign minister then insisted that “nothing” justified war now. This Franco-German grandstanding—the pair were promptly dubbed the “axis of weasels” by Americans—was a personal embarrassment for Mr Powell, the administration’s strongest proponent of seeking UN backing for American policy.

Heh. I think Powell’s getting his revenge. (And see the map below).

HERE’S A GRAPHIC VIEW of support and opposition in Europe regarding the war, courtesy of The Agonist.

Kind of puts those “unilateralist” claims in perspective, doesn’t it?

LEE HARRIS writes on the difference between helping the Third World and feeling good about ourselves.

DOES FRANCE + GERMANY = EUROPE? Apparently the editors of the Boston Globe are geographically challenged, as this editorial neglects to mention the ten other European countries who are supporting the United States, something that ought to be relevant here. On the plus side, though, it does mention “Chirac’s record of collaboration with Saddam.”

FRESNO STATE and Eco-terrorists — can this be as bad as it sounds?

Maybe it’s a “sting” operation.

NO TATTOOS, PLEASE: We’re sailors.

ROBERT KAGAN writes about courage in the face of anti-Americanism on the part of the European leaders who are standing by America. He’s certainly right about the extent to which the European intelligentsia has aligned itself with Pat Buchanan-style conspiracism, anti-Americanism, and anti-Semitism. And yes, it’s widespread enough that it’s brave to face it down; it’s hard to imagine very many American politicians who would be willing to do so, though I can think of a couple.

But it’s a calculated risk that will pay off big, so long as the United States wins the war. The anti-Americanism won’t go away — it will never go away so long as Europe suffers so many self-inflicted wounds it’s afraid to talk about — but as Fareed Zakaria wrote last year, victory is the best propaganda, and if the war in Iraq goes well it will die down quickly, since a lot of the current upsurge is based on fear. And, unlike many previous administrations, the Bush folks seem to remember who America’s friends are, and who they aren’t.

U.S. TROOPS IN IRAQ: Pravda reports, Rantburg decodes. And note this item on Turkey.

NEXT, ARIANNA HUFFINGTON WILL BE MAKING S.U.V. COMMERCIALS: Mickey Kaus is defending Paul Krugman from his critics.

MAYBE A GANG OF ELEVEN? William Sjostrom reports on Irish support.

WHERE DIPLOMACY IS NOT SO SUCCESSFUL: Reader Jake Kreutzer sends this link to a story suggesting that the North Koreans are even stupider, and more suicidal, than I thought.

JOE KATZMAN looks at the diplomatic defeats that France has suffered and doesn’t credit the United States. He says that they have Tony Blair’s fingerprints all over them.

There’s something to this — but it’s not the whole story nor, as I will note in a later post, would the Administration fail to deserve substantial credit even if Katzman’s perspective were one hundred percent correct.

READ THIS POST by Dave Kopel over at The Corner on the latest Rave Act developments. And read the post below it, too.

JEEZ, a new traffic record. Over 112, 000 pageviews today already. Go figure.

IRAQI SPIES IN THE U.S.? That’s hardly surprising, given that we’re basically at war. But this Daily News report offers some surprises, though of course I can’t confirm its accuracy.

BROBECK, PHLEGER IS NO MORE. This won’t excite the non-lawyers, but it’s big news.

UNILATERALISM, MY ASS! (CONT’D): All I can say is, Advantage: Rumsfeld!

BUDAPEST, Hungary (AP)–The “new Europe” raised its voice Thursday, as eight of its leaders praised U.S. resolve in disarming Iraq and indirectly chided the traditional powers, France and Germany, for opposing U.S. plans for military action against Saddam Hussein.

But that’s old news. Now, though, the “gang of eight” is a “gang of ten:”

Some of Europe’s newest democracies have expressed the strongest support because of past U.S. economic and political support of their struggle to escape communism.

Albanian Prime Minister Fatos Nano, in a letter to Bush made public Thursday, pledged “total and unconditional” support in the showdown against Iraq. Prime Minister Mikulas Dzurinda of Slovakia called the declaration “the clear, right word at the right time,” and said he agreed with it.

The article goes on to minimize (if that’s possible) the military importance of Albania and Slovakia. But that’s not the point. The point is that — despite (or because of) their diplomatic anschluss — France and Germany are now isolated within the E.U. Indeed, there is now talk that the E.U. may splinter as a result of their anti-American efforts.

That probably won’t happen, but it’s a far cry from the “United Europe” stance that Chirac and Schroeder had in mind. Why, it’s almost as if they were lured into this position.

PARIS CORRESPONDENT NELSON ASCHER EMAILS:

Hello.

This is very important:

Though a minimum of 157 signatures was needed, by now more than 160 Euro Parliament representatives have signed the request demanding an investigation into how the Palestinians have been using the money given them by the European Union. Great for the very day the “gang of 8″ published its pro-US letter. Maybe things are begining to change this side of the ocean — and, by the way, this is also, and quite officially, the “hole in the head” Chris Patten was in need of.

Another diplomatic success. Heh.

READER ALAN CAMERON POINTS OUT that AOL’s $99 billion loss was close to double Iraq’s total GDP. Heh.

In the words of Jack Palance, “I crap bigger’n you.”

Almost twice as big, though admittedly, that was an unusually large crap. . . .

HMM. SCHWARZKOPF WAS SKEPTICAL, BUT NOW HE’S CALLING BUSH’S SPEECH “COMPELLING.” You don’t think the whole thing was scripted, do you? Surely not.

NO ANTI-SEMITISM HERE. Publish that cartoon with an obviously Arab figure and you’d be charged with “hate speech.” Heck, they might even advertise to find people who were offended.

UPDATE: No hate crime here, either!

I WAS JUST BEING HONEST: My comments on Gary Locke’s performance responding to the State of the Union got quoted in the Seattle Times.

Oh, well, I was nicer than Oliver Willis, who called Locke’s presentation “long and limp.”

DONALD SENSING identifies Bush’s most important sentence.

HERE’S A FIRSTHAND BLOG REPORT of Iraqi chemical weapons.

READER GABRIEL MENDEL POINTS OUT that even though the New York Times is basically ignoring the European leaders’ letter, the robots at Google News — handily outperforming the humans at the Times — have put the story up top.

UPDATE: Better late than never! The Times has it now.

PROFESSOR DAVID MOSER OF BELMONT UNIVERSITY has posted a defense of the Eldred decision on the new Belmont University faculty blog. (A great idea, by the way).

Meanwhile, Yale Law Professor Jack Balkin suggests that under Eldred, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act is unconstitutional.

FRANCE’S BAD WEEK: I reflect on the failures of Franco-diplomacy over at GlennReynolds.com, where I also suggest that the Bush Administration is playing a diplomatic game that goes well beyond Iraq.

Meanwhile, in response to the letter from 8 European leaders supporting the United States, reader Jim Campbell emails:

After reading the stunning op-ed letter in the WSJ this morning (to see the words “American bravery” in a letter signed by the heads of 8 European nations briefly stopped my heart), I thought of Bush and Chirac and Schroeder, and a movie scene immediately popped into mind – the scene at the end of Twelve Angry Men, where Henry Fonda looks at Lee J. Cobb and says, “You’re alone now.”

I like it.

UPDATE: Here’s an article that provides some insight into what’s going on:

BRUSSELS (Reuters) – A joint letter by eight European leaders backing the United States on the crisis with Iraq highlighted the European Union (news – web sites)’s divisions on Thursday, rubbing salt into the wounds of its stumbling foreign policy. . . .

The move appeared aimed at isolating France and Germany, which had publicly argued against a rush to war, and building a pro-American caucus within the 15-nation EU.

“This looks like Rumsfeld’s Europe,” one EU diplomat said, referring to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld’s dismissal of France and Germany last week as “old Europe.”

Buwahahahaha!

HERE’S A NICE PIECE ON NANOTECHNOLOGY and Bill Joy’s fears by Freeman Dyson, who invokes Milton’s Areopagitica.

UNILATERALISM, MY ASS! Jim Miller notes that the New York Times and other anti-war papers don’t seem to be giving the European leaders’ letter of support any play.

If the letter had been one of condemnation, want to bet it would have made the front page? I can’t even find it on the page that supposedly provides “complete coverage” of the war with Iraq.

Meanwhile, Juan Volokh is condemning French unilateralism.

THERE WILL BE AN ONLINE FORUM on affirmative action and diversity in higher education at the Chronicle of Higher Education’s website starting at 1 p.m. Eastern time. (The link is here.) I’ll be in class, but perhaps you’ll find it interesting.

TOM DASCHLE DOESN’T WANT YOU DANCING: Dave Kopel and I have a column criticizing the latest, sneaky, iteration of the RAVE Act, over at National Review Online.

UPDATE: TalkLeft has comments.

REGIS PHILBIN, ANTI-IDIOTARIAN? Reader Mark Garbowski emails:

This morning on the Regis and Kelly show, Regis made humorous reference to a news article on the offer of exile to Saddam. Kelly asked why we would pay for that and Regis replied that it’s cheaper than war. Then Kelly said yes, but why do we have to pay for it. We solve everyone’s problems and pay for everything and all the world does is hate us and burn the flag. In as close to verbatim as I can remember, Regis said:

“Yeah. Like South Korea. South Korea wants us out of their country. OK. But who’s gonna keep them safe from that crazy man up north? And the French! The only time the French want us to go to war is when the German army is sitting in Paris sipping coffee.”

Cheers from the studio audience. Go Regis.

First Oprah, now Regis. I told you there was a cultural sea-change underway. No wonder the traditional Vietnam-era left is so grumpy.

UPDATE: Dr. Manhattan emails:

I think the Oprah & Regis moments represent the obverse of the legendary LBJ story where he saw Walter Cronkite opine against Vietnam on his broadcast and asserted: “If I’ve lost Cronkite, I’ve lost the country.”

Indeed.

IN LIGHT OF THE AFRICAN AIDS INITIATIVE, producers of NPR-type shows should be aware of this song about AIDS by the Ugandan band Afrigo.

Meanwhile, Susanna Cornett emails:

A caller on the Curtis & Kuby show (WABC 770, NYC) just called in and said he thought Bush was going to give AIDS $$ to Africa because he wants the oil there.

Apparently it’s a one-size-fits-all meme.

Jeez, that guy is so behind the times. Doesn’t he realize it’s all about antigravity?

LET THIS BE A WARNING TO STUDENTS WHO GAME DURING CLASS. . . .

A Norwegian MP has been caught playing games on his handheld computer during a debate in parliament.

Trond Helleland didn’t know television cameras had zoomed in on him during a debate about Norwegians fighting in Afghanistan.

The Conservative MP says he had been meaning to check his schedule on his personal digital assistant, but couldn’t resist a round of the war game Metalion.

Personally, I’m just glad to hear that there’s someone in the Norwegian parliament who doesn’t sniffily disapprove of war games.

UPDATE: Norwegian blogger Fredrik Norman has links to pictures, and notes: “Who said Norwegian politicians were all doves? In the virtual year of 2252, they’re laser-firing hawks!”

“IT AIN’T DEAD YET:” DefenseTech warns that the TIA program hasn’t been killed, despite the contrary impression held by many.

Get a bigger stick, and whack it again.