NO SIZE FITS ALL by Michael S. Malone
Get ready for a bi-polar world.
Despite the title of a best-selling book of a few years back, it turns out that the world isn’t flat. And, despite all of the leveling forces being unleashed by the Internet, global business and social networks, it won’t be getting any flatter in our lifetimes.
However, don’t believe the growing legions of nay-sayers to Tom Friedman’s book either, because nearly all of them begin by accepting his underlying premise . . .and then set out to debunk it by showing how pockets of entrenched cultural differences won’t succumb to Twitter and the iPhone.
As many recent stories have shown, if your business follows Friedman’s advice you are very likely to get blind-sided by markets with rules that are alien – even antithetical – to our own. But if you follow the advice of the Friedman debunkers, you risk even greater disaster by not taking advantage of the scalability of the new digital marketing, distribution and sales tools – that is, while the “Flat Worlders” are likely to get bruised by real cultural diversity, non-believers, “Bumpy Worlders” risk being killed by more efficient competitors.
So, what’s the truth?
I’m not trying to be clever when I tell you that it is both. And yesterday, a new book of mine, No Size Fits All, was published to explain that answer. If you are keeping track, yes, that’s two books by me in a single year – and I’ve got a nice case of tendonitis to show for it.
The first book, if you’ll remember (The Future Arrived Yesterday) described the rise of a new kind of company, the ‘protean’ corporation, that is beginning to appear around the world. The new book looks at the emerging global market in which these companies will joust for dominance. I’ve co-authored No Size Fits All with marketing guru and Silicon Valley executive Tom Hayes, whose own book, The Jump Point – on the impending explosion of two billion more consumers around the world – was published last year and neatly dovetails with the two other books. Still to be written (next year, because I’m getting too old for this pace) is a fourth book, also co-authored by Tom and me, which will describe how these protean corporations will actually compete and eventually control the new global marketplace. That, with luck, will complete what we think is the first real vision of global business competition in the 21st century.
Now, let’s go back to that apparent contradiction between a world that is both ‘flat’ and ‘bumpy.’ To understand how that can be so, you need only look at your own life today as a consumer in the 21st century economy. I suspect that if you do so, you’ll see that you are, in fact, moving simultaneously in opposing directions.
On the one hand, all of us are becoming major players (because of our comparative wealth) in an emerging, Web-driven global economy. We shop on Amazon, buy from eBay, send Tweets and IMs, write Gmails, search Google, download iPhone apps and iTunes, watch Hulu, etc. We no longer really know or care where these enterprises are located, and we are comfortable in the knowledge that wherever we are on the planet, we can simply use or cellphones or laptops to access them. If that item we just won on eBay, or that website we regularly visit, happens to be located in Nairobi instead of Nashville, we are largely indifferent. By the same token, when we sit in that conference room at work and use the Cisco system to teleconference a meeting, the novelty of the other participants being in Tel Aviv, Sydney and Brussels wears off quickly.





The inter-linkedness of the world economy is not as new as people often think it is…
“Unfortunately in the year 1914 the whole world was one large international workshop. A strike in the Argentine was apt to cause suffering in Berlin. A raise in the price of certain raw materials in London might spell disaster to tens of thousands of long-suffering Chinese coolies who had never even heard of the existence of the big city on the Thames. The invention of some obscure Privat-Dozent in a third-rate German university would often force dozens of Chilean banks to close their doors, while bad management on the part of an old commercial house in Gothenburg might deprive hundreds of little boys and girls in Australia of a chance to go to college.”
Except for the archaic language, this might be a contemporary description of the risks and stresses of globalization. It is actually a passage from Hendrik Willem Van Loon’s book The Story of Mankind, published in 1921.
Counterintuitive but true.
There have been plenty of predictions,
mostly in SF, where crazy-but-true finds
a natural audience; I managed to discount
them, until I heard that The University
of Texas plans to upload all its campuses
into Second life, and subsequent searching
shows two new commercial versions of SL
coming on line.
Cyberspace already supports war, and will
soon be a place to work; Can cybersex be
far behind ? Faster, please.
There’s a quaint, olf fashioned word for what you are describing – escapism.
Just try to keep in mind two thirds of the world does not use the internet. The flight from reality is a fad, people will tire of it.
My response to a flat and lumpy world is: the world is made of Haves and Havenots. And the trend is increasing.