So, Carl says he stands for freedom, but every instance I listed is happening on a daily basis and he has yet to stand up for any of them. He probably also thinks it’s freedom of speech to drive spikes into trees so chainsaws break chains (and endanger lumberjacks).

Yeah, squatting is OK but a farmer can’t pump water out of his own ground to save his crops because the govt says so? Dude, you aren’t for freedom unless it’s your type of freedom. Your hypocrisy is sickening. At least a lot of us recognize people have a right to peacefully (if that means anything to you) protest the things we do that they don’t like.

I know so many liberals that were as infuriated over the DOJ’s refusal to go after the NBP members that were intimidating voters as I was. Those are liberals. You are a progressive, and there is a difference. They stand for principles of individuality and personal rights. You support a permanent ruling class that will benevolently take care of us. Only one of those views fits in with our founding fathers views on freedom. (Hint: They aren’t yours.)