“Obama’s monsters ball: How the White House opened its doors to some of Africa’s most evil dictators and homophobes and turned blind eye to their human rights record,” screams a London Daily Mail headline today. That tone carries over to the article itself:
President Barack Obama drew the diplomatic line somewhere at the first ever U.S-Africa summit at the White House this week by not inviting Zimbabwe’s brutal dictator Robert Mugabe.
But the guest list still included several other African leaders with only slightly better human rights records.
The White House promoted the summit as the largest-ever gathering of African leaders in the United States, with more than 50 countries represented.
The red carpet was rolled out for Equatorial Guinea’s Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo, who shot or jailed virtually all his political opponents, Gambia’s Yahya Jammeh, who threatened to ‘cut off the head’ of any homosexuals in the country and for Cameroon’s Paul Biya, who has the dubious honor of ranking 19th on author David Wallechinsky’s 2006 list of the world’s 20 worst living dictators.
The President’s opening speech avoided the prickly issues of homophobia and torture and instead sought out similarities between the two continents.
He opened with: ‘I stand before you as the president of the United States, a proud American. I also stand before you as the son of a man from Africa’.
Before going on to say: ‘Our faith traditions remind us of the inherent dignity of every human being and that our work as nations must be rooted in empathy and compassion for each other, as brothers and as sisters.’
Here we run the rule over nine of the most controversial leaders who enjoyed the lavish affair.
Pretty strong red meat there, and a damning portrait of the moral relativism of a president who cavorts with such venal, bloodthirsty types. But why I am I reading material with this tone in a British newspaper, instead of say, the Washington Post or the New York Times?
Oh right — sorry, I forgot.
Update: In contrast to the MSM’s Democrat operatives with bylines, including CNN, where as John Nolte noted yesterday at Big Journalism, the Time-Warner-owned network treats Hamas savages “with more respect than they ever have the Tea Party or GOP,” Matt Drudge, linking to the above Daily Mail article, at least knows a great story when he sees one:
(Bumped to top.)