Get PJ Media on your Apple

Ed Driscoll

Barry Eat World

April 12th, 2014 - 7:19 pm

And speaking of leftism devouring itself, there’s also the slow-motion continuous train wreck of Obamacare, personified by legendary Internet maven Kathleen Sebelius’s metaphoric farewell speech yesterday: President Nixon had his symbolic 18 minute audio gap — Sebelius has the 180 word gap, as seen in the schadenfreude-overload video above.

In his perch at Time magazine, which offers a rare dollop of sanity within the otherwise monolithic establishment left palace guard Time-Warner-CNN-HBO empire, Nick Gillespie of Reason writes, “We Deserved Better Than Kathleen Sebelius:”

But whether you’re among the 36 percent of Americans who have a favorable view of Obamacare or among the 53 percent who do not, it’s important to underscore the lessons of her tenure. Her widely acknowledged incompetence in overseeing the implementation of a major new program is one of the reasons why record numbers of Americans think the government has too much power and have low and declining levels of trust in government to do the right thing. Whether you’re liberal, conservative, or libertarian, that’s not a good thing.

Last fall, when Healthcare.gov went live and crashed again and again, Sebelius’s response was not to take responsibility or explain why the job was botched so badly but to plead for slack from customers. “Hopefully [website users will] give us the same slack they give Apple…. If there’s not quite the operational excellence right away, we’ll continue to press for that,” she told the press. “Apple, you know, has a few more resources than we have to roll out technology, and a few more people who’ve been working on the system for a while, and no one is calling on Apple to not sell devices for a year or to, you know, get out of the business because the whole thing is a failure.”

Actually, as Iowahawk replies on Twitter, “Sebelius is exactly what we deserved.” She’s merely the latest manifestation of the magical thinking that led a nation in 2008 to vote for a handsome young tyro politician with brilliant stagecraft (as long as his own scripts were working) who dropped by the Senate for a cup of coffee, over a former Navy POW with four terms in the Senate and a state governor for his vice president in 2008. Who then repeated the same process over again in 2012, despite the wreckage their choice caused — is still causing — the economy.

But as Erick Erickson wrote at Red State on Thursday when news broke that Sebelius was being pushed out, her resignation, coming in April, is the White House tacitly admitting that Democrats will likely lose the Senate:

They have been standing with her since last October. They stood with her when the President’s polling was nosediving and throwing her under the bus could have stopped the bleeding.

They are doing so now. Sebelius actually resigned last week and the President already has a nominee ready to roll out tomorrow.

Why?

Their internal polling must be terrible and they want her gone and the issue treated as “old news” before the GOP takes the Senate in November.

Sebelius leaving now is a pretty direct admission against interest that the Democrats expect to lose the Senate and do not see any events on the horizon to change that momentum. Now, they’re just trying to slow the momentum down.

Expect Republican senators to throw plenty of rhetorical punches in Sylvia Burwell’s face during her confirmation process as Sebelius’s replacement. (Particularly since, as this NBC News article from October is headlined, “Meet Sylvia Burwell, the woman who ordered the government shutdown.” If you wondered 85-year old vets couldn’t visit DC’s World War II memorial in October, Burwell and Barry are to blame.)

But just imagine how much more bruising the hearings for anyone Obama nominated to replace Sebelius would have been next year, if the GOP does regain majority control of the Senate.

Oh, and what happens if the Obamacare Krell Machine goes on devouring America? The left are hoping for a sort of Cloward-Piven two-step into single payer. Perhaps they might want to first see how that fever swamp dream is playing out for the citizens of tiny socialist Vermont. No wonder heroin seems so tempting a painkiller to its residents.

As to the rest of America’s left devouring itself between now and November, responding to Jonathan Chait’s early “pre-postmortem” for his fellow leftists in the New Yorker this past week, at City Journal, Fred Siegel proffers “A Glimpse into the Political Future:”

Despite a welfare state roughly as generous as Europe’s, American society is increasingly divided between those from two-parent families, who do okay or better, generally speaking, and those forced to struggle against the odds because of the absence of fathers. Today’s liberalism has little to say about how to help people rise from the bottom into the middle class. Rather, its proposals—like raising the minimum wage—are designed to make the already-working poor more comfortable. That’s perhaps an admirable goal, but it’s also a path to a class-stratified society.

The other great liberal political success story has been the rise of public-sector unions, which fueled both Obama’s reelection and Bill de Blasio’s victory in New York City’s mayoral race. They are now a key component of the liberal coalition. The upshot of Obama’s policies is that he has, Chicago-style, fed the top-bottom alliance of crony capitalists and the social-service state—the government-worker providers and the recipients of aid. This has left the private-sector middle class out in the cold.

Chait’s rhetorical nuance leaves no room for anger at a president whose supervision of Obamacare combines the administrative failings of George W. Bush in Iraq with the underhanded tactics of Richard Nixon. (Like Obama, Nixon tried to use the IRS to attack his enemies.) Obama has also shown no qualms about misleading the public—from claiming that the terror attack in Benghazi was the product of an anti-Islamic videotape to promising that “if you like your health-care plan, you can keep it.”

If the Democrats do take a shellacking this November, they will no doubt attempt to pin blame on the supposed psychological failings of Republican voters. It’s a trope dear to liberals since the 1920s. For the good of the country, though, let us hope that, unlike Chait, they will come to grips with the all-too-material failures of the Obama years.

They can’t. The narrative is fixed: the Progressive road is always bright and shiny and well-lit and Nirvana is always just around the bend. Only the driver and his co-pilots can be blamed for crashing the bus on the way to getting there.

QED:

 Update: “HATRED & DIVISION: The Democrat Platform, Illustrated,” at Doug Ross’s Director Blue Weblog.

<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
>>"But just imagine how much more bruising the hearings for anyone Obama nominated to replace Sebelius would have been next year, if the GOP does regain majority control of the Senate."

Sorry, my imagination doesn't stretch so far to envision Republicans being "bruising" in any context.

Fred Siegel writes...>>(Like Obama, Nixon tried to use the IRS to attack his enemies.) "

Sorry, Fred. Obama didn't "try" to use the IRS to attack his enemies\. He used the IRS to attack his enemies -- and is still doing so. Get with it, dude.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
"Liberals" are not eating anything. They have been swallowed whole by radical hard leftism. There is nothing "liberal" remaining on the left, except a coughed up hairball in an article or movie from the propaganda wing of the anarchist cult big cat diary.

In fact, real "liberals" would be shamed by what is being crushed in their name. The virulent disease of radical leftism has taken over the host body and destroyed all of its internal organs.

Tolerance? There is no more intolerant person in the nation than a radical leftist. Race neutral, unbigoted, inclusive? There is no group or individual more interested in advancing divisiveness, racial animus and stereotyping racial epithets, sowing the seeds of racial discord... than a hard leftist.

Openminded, seeking diversity of opinion, dedicated to academic and scientific pursuit of truth and fact based, evidentiary conclusions? The radical left is not merely the antithesis of such pursuit, it viciously slanders and slays the mere attempt to try to challenge radical orthodoxy.

The hard left pushes anarchy, not because of anything, but in spite of nothing to be against. It needs to invent enemies that do not exist so that the anarchy is edgy and hipster doofus worthy.

This...is the sad, pathetic death rattle of the aging hippie trying to rage against the dying of the light.

Trying to milk the sap out of the withering tree of radicalism in one last futile gasp.

They steal "liberalism" and wear it as a mask. They invert the narrative of "liberalism" and turn it on its head.

They actually oppose every basic, fundamental tenet of "liberalism" and then force compliance with sedition, treason, lawless, totalitarianism, tyranny and traitorism by telling the soft left that they won't be able to sit at the "kewl Kidz" lunch table if they dare to stray from the Manifesto.

Terrified of not being "accepted" by the Arrested Adolesence High Priests of Culture (Hollywood, Academia and Propaganda Media), the "liberals" sit in silence and let their principles be bastardized at will.

They aren't merely brain dead. They are soul dead.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
Part of being a liberal is always believing that you, through holding the levers of power in government, know best how to micromanage everyone's lives. But even in the outwardly-metrosexual world of the left, there are still a number of Alpha males (and females) among the group who aren't going to be content to simply carry out the orders -- They came here to give them, and there are just too many wanting that role who see no qualms in demonizing people on their own side up until 15 minutes ago in the same way they do conservatives, if that's what it takes to gain the upper hand.

That's why the left will always fracture into the Judean People's Front vs. the People's Front of Judea, because being able to control the end result is more important than the end result. Combine that with the now-common blueprint of playing the race/gender/sexual orientation card against your enemies, and it's no shock to see something like the Suey Park vs. Stephen Colbert kerfuffle of two weeks ago (whether or not Colbert's assertion to take Dave's place as the late-night liberal soothsayer for the bi-coastal crowd enlightens Park on low her standing is in the professionally aggrieved pecking order is open to debate. But things like that or the private sector unions-vs.-environmentalists over the Keystone XL pipeline is in the long run going to make the current Democratic coalition as tough to keep together as was the one between the southern and northern Democrats 45 years ago).

28 weeks ago
28 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (24)
All Comments   (24)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
“Barack Obama thinks his job is to lead the mob, not the country.” Certainly he is entirely unconcerned about what "the people" think or want. He is only concerned with his own agenda.

He reminds me of a personality type I saw described in a recent article, "Psychopaths: how can you spot one?" in the Telegraph. A criminal psychologist gives a list of 20 criteria for identifying a psychopath.

Some psychopathic characteristics:
glibness and superficial charm
grandiose sense of self-worth
cunning/manipulative
pathological lying
emotional shallowness
callousness and lack of empathy
a tendency to boredom . . .

That sounds a lot like Obama's personality (NOT diagnosis). I was so impressed with the article, I ordered the book from which the article was drawn, Snakes In Suits. It's comical how many parallels there are between the psychopath syndrome and Obama.

Get this choice tidbit : “Psychopaths can... have an apparent IQ higher than it really is, because they’re not inhibited by moral concerns.” ROFL!

(show less)
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
re: the photo of Obama embracing Sebelius...

Georgie Porgie, pudding and pie,
kissed the girls and made them cry.
But when the boys came out to play,
Georgie Porgie ran away.


Boys: come out to play. We need you.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
WTF was that pop-up cr-p?

Losers.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
Do dems know that with Comrade O they have come to the end of the progressive line? Do they know that his identity-racialist-whatever any grievance-that-turns-you-on approach to being president has brought them to the end of dem history? The good news is that they probably don’t.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
Most ardent institutional gender advocates? Women. Why? Male gender advocacy. Is there institutional male gender advocacy? No.

Most ardent institutional race advocates? Blacks. Why? White race advocates. Is there white institutional race advocacy? No.

Which institutionally discriminates more against women and gays - Christianity or Islam? Islam. Which do feminist and gay advocates hate the most? Christianity.

Seems there's a bit of a c0ck-up on the oppression front. I give you evidence of why history's also-rans have been history's also-rans: sheer stupidity and incompetence.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
"shellacking"?

How 'bout bloodbath.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
We're all caught up in the small c's' maelstrom alright; I'd like to find a way out.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
>>"But just imagine how much more bruising the hearings for anyone Obama nominated to replace Sebelius would have been next year, if the GOP does regain majority control of the Senate."

Sorry, my imagination doesn't stretch so far to envision Republicans being "bruising" in any context.

Fred Siegel writes...>>(Like Obama, Nixon tried to use the IRS to attack his enemies.) "

Sorry, Fred. Obama didn't "try" to use the IRS to attack his enemies\. He used the IRS to attack his enemies -- and is still doing so. Get with it, dude.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
The civil rights struggle couldn’t be the answer; for one thing, it united rather than divided the country, except for the segregationist Old South.

Not the civil rights struggle, but affirmative action and school busing, the "remedies" to de facto segregation, put government proctors in charge of *everything*, provided an excuse for goverment to be intrusive in everything, and this was a major change.

Plus it came with another change, that henceforth we should never judge, and henceforth all were equal, everyone gets a prize, excellence does not exist, anyone can do anything. IOW, we live with lies, we lie to our children, we teach them to lie to each other and us.

All consequential damages from ending segregation - given the cover of good intentions, all overreach, all unnecessary, even counterproductive, but even so.

Not divisive?
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
"Liberals" are not eating anything. They have been swallowed whole by radical hard leftism. There is nothing "liberal" remaining on the left, except a coughed up hairball in an article or movie from the propaganda wing of the anarchist cult big cat diary.

In fact, real "liberals" would be shamed by what is being crushed in their name. The virulent disease of radical leftism has taken over the host body and destroyed all of its internal organs.

Tolerance? There is no more intolerant person in the nation than a radical leftist. Race neutral, unbigoted, inclusive? There is no group or individual more interested in advancing divisiveness, racial animus and stereotyping racial epithets, sowing the seeds of racial discord... than a hard leftist.

Openminded, seeking diversity of opinion, dedicated to academic and scientific pursuit of truth and fact based, evidentiary conclusions? The radical left is not merely the antithesis of such pursuit, it viciously slanders and slays the mere attempt to try to challenge radical orthodoxy.

The hard left pushes anarchy, not because of anything, but in spite of nothing to be against. It needs to invent enemies that do not exist so that the anarchy is edgy and hipster doofus worthy.

This...is the sad, pathetic death rattle of the aging hippie trying to rage against the dying of the light.

Trying to milk the sap out of the withering tree of radicalism in one last futile gasp.

They steal "liberalism" and wear it as a mask. They invert the narrative of "liberalism" and turn it on its head.

They actually oppose every basic, fundamental tenet of "liberalism" and then force compliance with sedition, treason, lawless, totalitarianism, tyranny and traitorism by telling the soft left that they won't be able to sit at the "kewl Kidz" lunch table if they dare to stray from the Manifesto.

Terrified of not being "accepted" by the Arrested Adolesence High Priests of Culture (Hollywood, Academia and Propaganda Media), the "liberals" sit in silence and let their principles be bastardized at will.

They aren't merely brain dead. They are soul dead.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
Among your best, CFB. Well worth plastering on one's FB wall.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
1 2 Next View All

One Trackback to “Barry Eat World”