<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/2010/11/27/revising-janes-law/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 03:25:48 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Revising Jane's Law</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[To update P.J. O&amp;#8217;Rourke&amp;#8217;s great line, written late last month before the elections, November 2nd wasn&amp;#8217;t an election, it was a restraining order. And as Michael Gerson noted this week, in the aftermath, the Ruling Class left have been very sore losers indeed. This isn&amp;#8217;t itself all that surprising. But what is curious, Gerson wrote, are the number of conspiracy theories they&amp;#8217;ve been proffering lately.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:13:51 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Ed Driscoll]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/ed-driscoll/2010/11/27/revising-janes-law-n252891</link></item></channel></rss>