<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/2009/12/15/we-only-have-ten-years-to-stop-the-doomsday-headlines/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:16:20 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>We Only Have Ten Years To Stop The Doomsday Headlines!</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[In his latest piece for Townhall.com, John Hawkins does what the legacy media dreads to do: rifle through the memory hole to find the Top Ten Global Warming Doomsday Predictions from 1969 to the present. It&amp;#8217;s a reminder that plenty of &amp;#8220;we only have X years to save the planet&amp;#8221; (typically five, ten, or 20 years, though occasionally the doomsday prognosticator picks an odd number to prove he&amp;#8217;s super-serial about being creative) reached their expiration date a long time ago. And last time I checked, the earth doesn&amp;#8217;t resemble the CGI shots from Waterworld or the opening of Spielberg and Kubrick&amp;#8217;s A.I.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:50:22 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Ed Driscoll]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/ed-driscoll/2009/12/15/we-only-have-ten-years-to-stop-the-doomsday-headlines-n250753</link></item></channel></rss>