<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/2009/11/25/dispatches-from-the-house-of-sulzberger/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 08:51:56 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Dispatches From The House Of Sulzberger</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Last week, when we produced our &amp;#8220;Pinchurian Candidate&amp;#8221; video, we noted that New York Timesmen such as Frank Rich, had developed quite an idiosyncratic use of language; dubbing conservative Republicans in upstate New York &amp;#8220;Stalinists&amp;#8221; for wanting to replace a candidate who had run afoul of an incredible cross-section of the media, including the Weekly Standard, the Daily Kos and AP, with someone less tainted. Even though the Times itself had no problem with as odious a figure as Stalin while he was alive, or with more contemporary (one hesitates to dub them &amp;#8220;modern&amp;#8221;) totalitarian regimes such as Cuba, China, and North Vietnam.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:08:51 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Ed Driscoll]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/ed-driscoll/2009/11/25/dispatches-from-the-house-of-sulzberger-n250597</link></item></channel></rss>