<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/2009/05/23/and-you-think-tv-news-is-bad-today/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:29:33 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>And You Think TV News Is Bad Today...</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[This 1970 ad for ABC News seems to have been produced in the same vein as LBJ&amp;#8217;s infamous Daisy Ad. I wonder how this played for TV viewers at the time, with only three networks, PBS, and a handful of local stations to choose from on their dial? I think I would want to run as far away as possible from anything that sounded like this, but unlike today&amp;#8217;s demassified media, there were only two other choices available at the time for network news:]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 00:25:53 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Ed Driscoll]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/ed-driscoll/2009/05/23/and-you-think-tv-news-is-bad-today-n241023</link></item></channel></rss>