So far in the articles I’ve read it’s said that the alleged killer went to the police station and told the police that his wife was dead at their radio station. I haven’t read anywhere that he confessed to the murder.

While I think it is most likely that he did the revolting deed, the evidence we’ve been given so far – at least in what *I’ve* read so far – is circumstantial, not conclusive. It looks extremely bad for the guy, but is it possible that someone in his family or some other Muslim, say, from the Mosque he attends, learned about the wife suing for divorce and took it upon themselves to do an honor-killing, without consulting the husband?

At this early stage, before all the evidence is presented, I think people ought to be mindful about not making the easy assumptions.

While the husband looks like the guilty one, we need a trial and something more substantial and reliable than the first sensational reportings from the media to establish the actual culprit.

But whoever carried out the deed, it sounds another warning siren against Islam, itself.

Murders, domestic violence, occur in all cultures, and are perpetrated by people of all religions. But beheadings? Where do we tend to see that as the preferred method od dispatch? Hmm? But we musn’t judge them. We should only mercilessly judge Christians. That is the only religion that must not be tolerated, must be scorned, attacked and reviled at every turn.

Correct me if I am wrong, but you “smite the neck of the unbeliever.” For the believer, other forms of killing are used.

Is this a case of apostasy by the wife?