TO: Instalawyer
RE: Facts & Law & the Third Option
History will portray him as the most effective substantive president since FDR, and will view the right wing smear efforts (Whitewater, Lewinsky/impeachment) for exactly what they were. — Instalawyer
So….
• The Waco Massacre — Never happened
• Vince Foster — Didn’t die mysteriously, never checking out of WH security to be found dead in a park miles away.
• Ron Brown — Plane didn’t crash shortly after the FBI started investigating him
• Travelgate — Never happened
• Bombing Sudan and Afghanistan — Never happened
• Monica ‘BJ’ Lewinski — Didn’t give blow jobs in the Oval Office and Bill didn’t lie under oath about it
• Kyoto Accord — Was never supported by Clinton
• Setting Up US Security for 9/11 — Wasn’t deterioriated
• The Final Hour Pardons — Never happened
• Stealing property from the White House as they went out the door — Never happened
In truth all of those happened. And much, much more.
So the facts are against you counselor.
Care to argue the Law? None of those things are against the law? Or at least stupid beyond belief?
Your comments, especially the ‘smear efforts’, remind me of the Third Option of the Lawyers Rule:
[1] If the Law is against you, argue the facts.
[2] If the facts are against you, argue the Law.
[3] If the facts and the Law are against you, call the other side names.
Regards,
Chuck(le)
[Lawyer, n., One skilled at circumventing the Law. -- Ambrose Beirce, The Devil's Dictionary, written in the 19th Century]
P.S. I had an encounter with one of your ilk the other night as I sat on the city Zoning Board of Appeals. It was remarkable the ways this guy could twist the English language into so many pretzel shapes, like things buskers do with balloons for easily pleased children at a street fair.
