Charlie:
I respect your frustration with Mr. Jones’ behavior. You were evidently there to do a job, and Jones and this confrontation were not supportive or sympathetic of that fact. Your focus had to be on ‘potential’ threats which distracted you from an unbiased viewing of your surroundings.
But you begin to lose credibility with the ‘over the state line’ stuff. Any threats by Jones were intellectual challenges relating to Malkin’s written and spoken support of real threats to citizens, sovereignty and civility. Any honest review of Jones’ agenda, work, and working style will bear that out.
Continued insinuations that Jones was physically threatening only feed the false misrepresentation of those who cannot tell the difference between GreenShirt’s inciteful raves and Jones’ attempt to take Malkin to task for her threatening positions.
So I respectfully must ask you:
1) Did you not see GreenShirt arrive and depart with the Malkin camp? …or see him with the recreate68 bunch who you claim were the calmifiers?
2) Were you paid to protect Malkin’s physical being only or also to help her protect her public image against intellectual challenges?
Alex Jones:
For heaven sake, why couldn’t you just put Malkin on the spot for an interview? She deserves your confrontation. But it is never good to start out so confrontationally. You missed the opportunity for all these video hits to show her running, even from a polite invitation. (Since we are both confident that she would!)
Neo-Cons:
The left-right paradigm is alive and well here. And it continues to exacerbate fraudulent misperceptions, inaccuracies and outright lies.
Theo669 and SoulRebel have made cogent substantive statements here which have been countered only by off-point and unfounded irrelevances.
Mr. Green:
Your fluff piece was fun and enjoyable. But I regret that it is still circulating on sites headlined with the fraudulent claims that Jones called for murder.
