He picks someone who is a Washington heavyweight so his inability to lead is highlighted? But if he had picked a fresh face the claim would be same? Basically then, this “analysis” makes a judgment that has no connection to the actions of Obama since it would be the same no matter who he picked.
I’m certain the Obama camp has some good reasons for their pick. An analysis that completely ignores that and claims that McCain would use the same, “the Obama ticket is just not up to leading” even if he had made the exact opposite type of pick strikes me as just partisan wishful thinking. That may feel good but it is way to shallow to be of much use in defeating Obama.





