A Comment About

Abolish the Nobel Peace Prize

December 10, 2009 - 11:20 am - by Roger L Simon
Sharron Pitcher
2011-03-25 18:43:03

There will be more peace throughout the world if the Nobel Peace Prize is abolished. We have Americans with their President running around the world demanding one country’s leader after the other stand down from their “leader of the country” status. Americans would stop causing wars if the Peace Prize was abolished. We wouldn’t have to see dominant women like Mrs Bill Clinton, Samatha Powers et al on our TV screens day in and day out. We wouldnt have to look at Obama’s smug face hoping he will win another Prize. We may be able to keep Australia’s politicians from running around the world trying to pretend that they are capable of creating peace in another country when they are taxing their own people to death. The likes of Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard would have to stay at home and face their own country’s problems. The bottom line is, if the Peace Prize was abolished, the very same people who are running around the world voicing their condemnation of other world leaders, would not bother about the people involved in international conflict. We would not have to hear about how your Obama thinks he is the king of the world, we would not have to hear Mrs Bill Clinton’s demands to other countries. The Nobel Peace Prize has to be abolished to sustain world peace.