PJ Media

The WSJ article written by a professional pollster referenced in one of the posts above clearly states that this survey is methodologically so unreliable as to be meaningless. There are established procedures for running surveys. Those were all ignored, in a ridiculous way. As a scince publication, Lancet should have been aware of those deficiencies. Of course, you need the WSJ to report it; NYT and the likes can not be bothered.