After all, if the West supports it, it MUST be ‘bad’.
Neo-neocon:
For me it is as follows: what West and US do is usually good, including pressure on Iran or possible strike on Iran’s nuclear installations, putting a few little rockets in Poland ( however my Russian friends do not like it), etc. I find all those things to be right and good. I usually find myself on the same page with the Right commentators. There are only few exceptions: I did not think that democracy project in Iraq is a practical idea , just as some other democracy projects abroad.
But, this situations with US ardent support for Georgian membership in NATO (while Georgian president is a clear psycho and a sociopath), support for Georgian AGRESSION against South Ossetia is the first time when I find conservative commentators just as repugnant. Even if it was not genocide, it was still aggression. So whatever Russia did in responce, it is still idiotic and moronic to defend Saakashvilli either, which is what many of you seems like to do. I feel deep contempt for some of the comments here, just the same contempt I feel for the left press.
In our time we had done a lot to eliminate a threat of nuclear confrontation of Soviet Union and US. This generation of mentally retarded politicians is undermining our achievements, and you guys do not dig it. Do you want to live under threat of nuclear attack, to learn how to use a gas mask and learn how to run to a nuclear shelter or pay for construction of one connected to your basement? You can get back all those things very soon, just as we had them in 70th , if you continue having a president who is a complete moron.
