Anthony,
You are a neoteric (you love the new for the sake of new to the exclusion of what is ‘old’) and consensus approving ideologue, nothing more. You would laud the military and I see particularly that you cite the IDF. Imagine that, this explains why you would not incense the memory of St. Gianna but would only praise her ‘accomplishments’. I suppose you would incense the Talmud though. No, Anthony, I have been in the military–I am an Iraqi War Vet–unlike the oxygen-thieves that often describe themselves as Neo-cons. What you claim is propaganda pure and simple. Construct your mental Utopia but please do not foist the paint on the canvasses of others, especially when they know better than you do. Moreover, I don’t know what logic you could be speaking of because it certainly is not Socratic or symbolic since your rationale is not tautological.
Since the scientists are your new priests and the yarns they spin are your new dogmas, perhaps you should become a student of the Philosophy of Science so that you would know and not be duped by the limitations and boundaries of Science since it claims to be as infallible as any Pope ever did. It would behoove you to pick up Sir Karl Popper’s The Logic of Scientific discovery and learn about the falsifiability criterion.
As far as saying nothing about Matriarchy that is a bit specious at best. The obverse is implied for you certainly cannot maintain that what is present or current is the mean—or do you? Pray tell, who says that the women is equal? Does nature say she is equal? Does the state say she is equal? Nature, that oracular inspiration for the high priests of science does not say the genders are equal. So, the state or the polity does, which is an artificial construct that lasts as long as the will to power lasts in any government. What you should uphold and laud is what is the subsurface and the substantial notion of ‘being’ wherein any dignity by which ‘equality’ is presumed or predicated must exist if it exists at all. Finally, you will dream what you dream and dream what you cannot control but do not presume that what is not empirically verifiable does not ontologically exist or lie within the realm of ontological possibility. You are a novice and adept of the zeitgeist, indoctrinated with the vision of your elders who came from a ‘past’ that you presume to predicate a ‘future’ upon. When the sacraments of your high priests are ineffective and the Shekennah cloud of your ‘feminine’ wisdom dissipates from the sanctuary of your Kabbalistic and materialistic ‘wisdom’, you will see what dream will haunt you—and it may be horrific.
