Lacking in analytical specificity? When was the last time you read an article so heavily annotated, with the annotation directed *precisely* to that which it referred (while maintaining such a light-hearted tone as it lanced leftist boils of elitism)?
Are you saying it was populist because it was against snobbery? I can only assume that as the basis for such an unfounded comment. Pointing out imperial nudity does not a publican make, Miss. Please refer to the definition of populism, and you will find that it fits the subjects of this article much more than its author.
Isaiah Kalinowski
Alexandria, Virginia





