Hankmeister
2006-10-21 06:15:39

Look, I’ve made this point before at other web/blogsites. There is absolutely no way that roughly 500 Iraqi civilians have died every day since the beginning of the Iraqi war in March of 2003. If the number of civilians death had been even 100 a day, the lamestream media would have be on this like stink on a skunk.

For one thing, without any demographic information, there is absolutely no way to distinguish between casualties who were true male civilians and Muslim male insurgents. If it is the latter, we should be celebrating the high casualty rates because that means a lot of Islamofascist wannabes are being terminated which can only mean that there will be less militant vermin for the Iraqi government to deal with in when we withdraw and turn over all security operations to the Iraqis.

Also, I bet dollars to donuts that the vast majority of casualties are male. This raises red flags already. Did this study at least separate out Muslim males between the ages of 17-50 (fighting age) and women and children?

At the height of civilian casualties DUE TO MUSLIM TERRORIST ACTIVITIES, the death count averaged about 25-30 civilian deaths a day. Over a period of a year that’s about 15,000 civilians. Personally, I think the number is somewhere around 35,000 total over the whole three year period, with about 95% of the casualties being the direct result of Muslim on Muslim violence. To blame Bush or America for this would be like blaming a doctor for the spread of cancer when he finds it and is trying to cure the patient through the best medical techniques available.