A Comment About

Requiring Flex-Fuel: A Giant Step Towards Energy Security

July 24, 2008 - 12:30 am - by Mary Grabar
Typical Whte Person
2008-08-05 20:12:34

some scientists ain’t so bright nohow.

Ethanol requires subsidies and subsidies require payoffs in DC which creates PORK. A vicious circle.

Forests are a better source of fuel since we are not using them for 2×4′s. Wood has more BTU’s than corn as does sugar which is cheaper. But the smart scientist take a basic food and run up the price with no concern for crop rotation.

We have coal, we have shale, we have oil, we have wind, we have tides, we have solar, nuclear and natural gas.

WE need to be a net exporter of energy!

get Congress out of the legislation for profit business and dump the trial lawyers and enviro whack jobs.

DRILL, DIG and BUILD NOW