Quite right, WJ. It’s a bad sign when an article’s own links don’t back up the article’s assertions. And of course we get a rehash of the leftist rewriting of history over the Swift Boaters. It apparently matters not a whit that the Swift Boaters were right on every issue they raised (some were important, others were petty, but all have so far held up to scrutiny).
But this article really falls apart in its initial assumption–that McCain has to win these women voters for Obama to lose them. Wrong, there is a third, almost as damaging to Obama, and very likely outcome–that many of these women who tell the polsters they still prefer Obama will decide on election day that they have better things to do with their time than go to the polls because they don’t feel all that strongly about him anymore.
You see, in the general election, unlike in the Michigan primary, Obama won’t be awarded the votes he doesn’t get.
