PJ Media

When I made the first comment in this thread,on Oct 20, 10:52 AM 117 comments have been made. A few are duplicate commentators which I tossed out and a rough count is as follows:

88 against the study, statistics,etc.

22 for.

This is 80% think the study is flawed, possibly politically motivated and a ver few of all of the commentators, really understanding the real issue here.

MainStream Media (MSM) bias that is politically motivated.

Several of the commentators I have greater confidence in their comments because they have been to Iraq or lived in Vietnam. Both situations where the MSM played a pivotal roll in assisting the real villians here, i.e. those people that started the problems, continued methodically to kill civilians(remember Pol Pot- outgrowth of the US not keeping our treaty with SEATO.. look up SEATO folks) and today with the gangsters that have no problem killing innocent civilians with car bombs,etc.

The MSM and those 22 supporters of this study have contributed to what is commonly known as “aid and comfort to the enemy” or as one commentator “seditious behavior”.

The proof of MSM bias is this:

Watch the 3 network evening news.

Tell me if you did an actual word count of what they all said.

There were more “words” used to support this study than “words” used to refute the study. Why? Read this and draw your own conclusions.

Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: “Stupid thing to say. It was completely wrong.

But I do think that, I do think that the mainstream press,

I’m not talking about the blogs and Rush and all that,

but the mainstream press favors Kerry. I don’t think it’s worth 15 points.

That was just a stupid thing to say.”

Kurtz: “Is it worth five points?”

Thomas: “Maybe, maybe.”

- Exchange on CNN’s Reliable Sources, October 17, 2004.

Evan Thomas is the son of Socialists Norman Thomas and current Editor of Newsweek.

He said it. I didn’t!

Further proof needed?

Polling:

Are you aware that the recent CBS poll showing President Bush approval

rating of 32% was based on more democrats than GOP?

Total respondent 1,018

Republicans 272 26%

Democrats 409 40%

Independents 337 33%

Again, using statistics, why couldn’t CMS have had an equal balance? Because it would have skewed the poll. Bias at work.

Another aspect that the apparent supporters of the study/Bush haters anti-Iraq seem to forget is this.

If Bush was “creating more terrorists”, if Bush was killing more civilians, please explain why the gangsters want Bush out and the democrats in?

They supported Kerry, they support any person/organization that supports them. This study supports them. More importantly though they know that US polls as in vietnam, Mogodushi and other pullout situations that unlike the Americans during WWII we are soft and will give up if the going gets tough.

So what do these gangsters do? They raise the violence. All of you commentators, do you for one minute believe that the majority of our military is rampantly killing people like Kerry said was done in Vietnam?

Stories like Abu Ghrab, Gitmo, etc., blown totally out of proportion by the MSM have done nothing but given

“Aid and comfort” to the enemy.

If every anti-Bush commentator on this thread were intellectual honest, they would admit to:

1) By given credence to this poll this provides the gangsters with more conviction that we will give up and leave the Iraqis to these gangsters.

2) That the MSM bias, driven by pure political animus towards President Bush has prolonged this war, has contributed directly to the deaths of US soldiers and Iraqi civilians again .. all because the hate Bush.

I am more disgusted with those people that have believed the MSM crap then I am with the MSM simply because at least the MSM is blantant with their bias. You commentators that resort to name calling, irrationale statements – you are doing what is really sad “feeling” instead of “thinking”.

There will never be any positive results in this world if people respond to their “feelings” rather than if they “think”. If you commentators that support this study were honest, you would look at how much you just hate Bush. Not this front on the war on Terror. Just Bush. And this is pure emotional responses, based not on any facts.

And don’t give me the MSM baloney regarding WMDs… they were found.

You just don’t want to believe the facts. Saddam ignored the world’s sanctions 13 times. You don’t believe that. It is a fact.

The MSM bias is killing people. That is a fact and you commentators are supporting the killing of US soldiers and innocent civilians by these gangsters by believing the MSM crap and wanting the US to abandon these people that want desparately to live without having a religious nut case like Satr,et.al. requiring them to wear burkas, etc.

You are assisting religious zealots to take over the world. You are worse than they are. At least these zealots believe in something. You just hate Bush regardless of how much damage currently or in the future to all of us including yourselves.