PJ Media

Just an observation but has anyone noticed that the anti-war respondents resort to name calling while the ones critiquing the study attempt rational arguments to make their case. Makes me reason that the anti-war arguments are based more on emotional immature thought processes and less on rational objectivity. This correlates to the reports the mainstream media project in attempting to draw emotional empathy while discarding objectivity in order to attract an audience. Congratulations to you relational thinkers you are winning me over to your side.