Kylie-Anne is nearly unique among published writers in actually having the measure of this evil individual.
I have not seen her discoursing on the topic specifically, but I suspect that if she has or were she to she would observe that Zerobama — who I think fits the image of the 12th Imam, and may do even self-consciously — is anything but “an empty suit” or “inexperienced” or “an unknown.” He has very definite content — as does his domestic partner — and very great depth of experience promoting it and is fully in plain view about all of that every minute of his day.
Nor does “the MSN” hide anything about him. Their very renunciation of reason in the penumbra of his aura says exactly who he is and for all to see. The guy is an open book in the behavior of his cadres.
Yet, it has been difficult for those, myself included, who are not misanthropic to realize the full horror this individual intends to visit upon humanity. It is not in our nature to think the way he thinks, to plan what he and his spouse and sponsors plan, to deceive as he and his spouse and sponsors relish doing.
Humans are not built the way Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Hitler and their race are built.
This fellow is.
Humans simply do not have the impulses he has and so it is difficult for them to realize what he is and what he and his myrmidons sponsors are up to.
Kylie-Anne does.
I concur with the thought that he is a puppet of some very wealthy individuals, e.g., George Soros. But I think that, though true, this is a trivial observation.
Ultimately, this individual rises and falls from his own sovereign impulses, the contents of his own heart, just as every creature does, In his case, those sovereign impulses are evil and if he ever lays hands on the mechanisms of government of this nation, this nation and many more with it will jet crash.
The take-home of that realization is that this individual and his mentors in academe, ecclesia and finance and his myrmidons want that outcome. They want the United States replaced with flat-lined collectivism (Lileks’ term is “aggressive messianic collectivism”).
They want to eliminate the moral act, which constitutes an individual person, from the life of society and the dynamics of history. They want collective rights and consciousness and no individual ones. Conformity, not creativity. Uniformity, not deservedness.
This individual and his retinue are determined spokesmen for and implementers of the collectivist/revenge-taking character of “liberation theology” (a redundant phrase designating an ideology that promotes neither liberation nor theology). They are Popper’s personalities.
