PJ Media

Nothing I can add to the above comments other than this:

If we statistically sampled the above posts offered by those individuals clearly FOR the war, I’d be willing to bet a case of Leinenkugel’s Red Lager that they’d be overwhelmingly heavy on systematic analysis of the Lancet study as well as inclusion of refuting evidence.

Conversely, if we did a statistical sample of posts submitted by those OPPOSED to the war, we’d find they were overwhelmingly heavy on slogans, non-sequiturs, circular logic, and unsupported assertions.

Anybody care to bet that I’m right?