I’m somewhat amazed at the way most posters blithsly paper over Mary Grabar’s contention that flex fuels will win the war on terror.
Exactly how?
Most posters above become lost in the thicket of mundane details surrounding the logistics and cost/benefit of flex fuels. But their various thrusts fail altogether to explain exactly how these flex fuels will win security from Islamic Jihad.
One last time : even if flex fuels help drive the price of oil back into the $8-$35 range, as they were during the three decades when Islamic Jihad began to reassert itself, then all we would have done would be to turn back the pace of Jihad to ore-2006 levels, and we see that’s not enough.
On $8-$35 per barrel oil, the Nazi regimes of Islam have no problem waging Global Jihad. So what will flex fuels magically accomplish? After all, isn’t this the entire premise of Ms. Grabar’s article?
She correctly suggests that oil is nearly the only things Muslim nation produce to pay for all the terror mosques, and terror toys such as nukes. But unless the revenue stream from oil is entirely cut off, won’t their Jihad continue? This little detail is glibly ignored by virtually everyone discussing the topic. Am I Cassandra?
