You feel that we are trying to gain the best long term payoffs by invading two sovereign nations and pissing off the rest of the world? I’m sorry but I don’t get the logic there. If we piss off the world, it seems to be reasonable that those whom we invades’ allies will be much more inclined to be anti-U.S., and quite possibly be a “threat” to us later when they decide to protect themselves by building a nuke as well.
I honestly don’t believe that war with Iran is imperative. If we leave Iraq, stop giving a blank check to Israel, and force them to be reasonable for a change, and then stop interfering in all sorts of sovereign nations’ affairs that we would be much less likely to even have such “enemies”. To go along with that, securing our borders at home would probably do us a much greater good in the long run using microeconomics to show that securing now equals less damage later.
