The United States would be far better governed by its democratic constituents if their news intake were not overwhelmingly biased by the information filters applied by the New York Times.
Should the general population read, and view on the networks (which also follow the NYT lead), daily information which honestly reported the whole spectrum of events, the Kennedy Democrats would no longer have the unholy advantage they’ve enjoyed since the Vietnam war in spinning news, and public opinion, to their advantage.
And the conclusion to be drawn is, that more of the US population would have full perspective on events and political candidates, and consequently the decisions made in voting booths would more nearly reflect the public’s wishes.
Ergo, the NYT should shape up or ship out. And take Walter Duranty’s Pulitzer “prize” with it.
