TO: ddc
RE: How So?
Pot calling the kettle black.– ddc
What’s THIS? You’re one of the godless Bible-Thumpers? How very odd….
RE: Flip-Side Learnings
Perhaps you might learn something on the flip side.– ddc
I’m always eager to learn. Comes with being an ENTJ (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator).
Lead me!
Specifically, understand this, that your recitations hold no value to the non-Christian outside the respect given for you to recite. Meaning, your prophet is not better, wiser, than mine or anyone else’s.– ddc
Is that MY problem? Or theirs?
As for MY prophet….how can there be an effective comparison unless you or they tell me who their prophet is? Otherwise, it’s all bombast and bluster. You can’t do a true compare and contrast analysis, if there is nothing, or no one, to compare with.
Don’t you think….[Note: Loaded question, that.]
Additionally, others might hold that there IS no prophet therefore the injection of your religious beliefs renders you incredible. Do you understand?– ddc
Really? Just because I have an opinion that is diametrically opposed to someone else, I should be silenced? Well. I’ve met a lot of people like that. They operate their own blogs and live down to such standards. They resemble the killers of history; ‘If you can’t silence them, kill them.’
Good thing that the operators of this system don’t ascribe to YOUR beliefs about Freedom of Expression. Eh? Otherwise, YOU might be the one ‘killed’ here.
If you don’t, it would serve you well to broaden your circle of real life acquiantances to include both non-Christians and non-believers. In that way you can also learn something.– ddc
I associate with MANY people from MANY different backgrounds and belief systems. Probably much more diverse than your circle. We enjoy exchanges of ideas. Probably much more so than you do. [Note: Click on my name to get a clue; wiccan, homosexuals, transgenders (including post-surgical), junkyard operators, pathologists, computer programmers, professors, gun-lovers, gun-haters. You name em. We got em.]
What’s your point? Or are you just demonstrating your pejorative nature again?
With respect to Prejudice, it seems yours is glaring right back at you.– ddc
Please be specific.
Regards,
Chuck(le)
P.S. Is this another ‘attack’ scenario, as you mentioned down the hall from here? Sure looks like it to me.
P.P.S. Care to get back ON-TOPIC instead of these pathetic ad homs?
May I offer an on-topic discussion for your consideration? How about…
Why is citing christian ethics inappropriate for relationships between men and women, vis-a-vis malfeasance on either party’s part.
I’d certainly find that much more stimulating and educational than beating you up on matters of your prejudice.
