well, Sara , i DID enjoy it))))))) kisses)))
well let me get back to business, i am going to deconstruct you(your post) to atoms)))
Although i suspect you emotions and hormones will never let your mind work ON THE LEVEL but i give you a try)))
So, lets start:
——-
>Kabud: An empty headed sloganeer playing the part of a sexist to degrade >the person suggesting Kabud use his brain when deciding on our current >military strategy and foreign policy.
no clue what u wanted to say except that i am a bad guy)) laughs to follow)))
>I’m an emotional little girl – unlike the great and powerful heckler, Kabud with a dick and a first grade level knowledge of “world peace.” Peace, peace, Kabud. Peace.
well, on the subject of emotions i answerd in 1st par))) but no peace to you cause stupid don’t deserve it))
>Everything about the military stragegy in Iraq is available to you to read >for yourself.
even more: my associate traveled there as a political consultant in 2005)))
cant tell no more- classified. no smilies though.
>Try reading, Kabud. Did you ever hear the big people talk about a change >in strategy called “the surge?” Reading is not so bad, really. Slogans are >easy and sexism…well you reveal your little self to be at the first grade >level, don’t you.
by the way: why do you Sara discuss Iraq here? I did not say a word on Iraq and if you wont be so stupid you even could have checked the article title:
former-cia-agent-in-iran-comes-in-from-the-heat
As far as military strategy in Iraq- i have NO COMMENTS. I support the President fully in it and never claimed that i have any knowledge in current military strategy of US there. But i can comment on political strategy issues in conjunction to Iraq situation. Clean your lenses and check the rag.
>Kabud, that was the CIA who missed the coming fall of the Soviet Union. As >a American man, you should be interested to research that question >yourself: how did the CIA miss the coming fall of the USSR? What a screwed >up Agency, huh? Seems to me if Americans were smarter than hecklers, they >would want answers and changes in response to your question.
MOLES. Subversion. Stupidity. Bribes, penetration on the highest level. Treason. According to the analysis my associate did there are at least 6 high level moles in CIA as we speak. Reports were filed if u dare to ask. I did not just research: i also warned- when i could- and am WARNING CONSTANTLY. Angleton and Golitsyn also tried, but to no avail. I am serious.
>You should ask Clinton’s military people about his strategy after the >first World Trade Center bombing – not me or the military leaders >currently in power.
EXACTLY. ask clinton and after Clinton. Listen, girl, watch this:
http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/index.php?main_page=product_video_info&products_id=181228-1&highlight=Rice
and pay attention. Ask questions if it is hard to understand. Or read here
http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/douglass/2004/0330.html
>There is a thing in the US called a constitution and
>you see, that makes the President the commander over military forces and
>National defense strategies. Clinton was the commander in Chief while Bin
>Laden attacked the US – more than once.
blahblahblah, seems like you are in 2nd grade. You are so infantile(((
No difference: clinton of course did much more harm but the other one unfortunately DID NOT CORRECT IT. And people died. Although he could.
>If you were a man reader, you
>would find that Clinton had no US defense military strategy because, like
>you, he was not interested in US defense.
How do you know? WATCH CONDOLEEZZA testemony AGAIN AND AGAIN. LEARN.
>He gave our military over to the
>UN to defend….MUSLIMS while we were being attacked by…MUSLIMS! Were you
>big enough to read about that war, Kabud? Clinton was a 60’s anti-war man
>and so was his co-president. Which is why we were attacked on 911. Now we
>have a new Commander in Chief who is intersted in National Defense, which
>is why we responded to the jihadists and why we have no been attacked
>again.
You are boring me. Beleve me i know things about clinton sponsors that you would not even dare to imagine. There are facts known to me that may point to clintons using contract killers from soviet mafia sponsors to silence people in USA. You dont have ANYTHING interesting to produce. I am givin up on you. Evaporate.
>I know you don’t like reading long things, being more comfortable with first grade level slogans written by girls in pink,
This girl in pink is you my dear. if you want details- click on my name and comunicate personaly. There are things i cant put in public here, but if you rally interested – we can use your help. We are recruiting.
>but do you remember reading anything about Bin Laden being offered up to Clinton after his many attacks on the US?
of course. And i know why he refused. Because he knew the Laden works for the same people he worked. No: WORKS.
>Read, Kabud. Even a girl can read so a thing with dick should be twice as good at it, if you would only try! Why did Clinton not take him into US custody?
well, i am disapointed. I thought you are MAY BE Anne Korin. I was Wrong.
anyway if you are interested- you can help our cause. May be we can find some common grounds
