Obama Urges Court to Vacate AGW Decision. I Smell a Rat (or Two!)
There is one other largely unnoticed aspect of this situation, namely an enormous FATAL fault within all three of the global warming nuisance cases. I summarized that fault in my American Thinker article yesterday, “Supreme Court to Hear Global Warming Case” http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/12/supreme_court_to_hear_global_w.html
Excepts: “The 12/6 announcement by the Supreme Court to hear an appeal in a global warming nuisance case is a classic example of a double-edged sword…. AGW believers hope the Court will ultimately accept the simple mantra that global warming science is settled, thus corrupt skeptic scientists must be ignored. Sadly, it takes a maddening amount of detail to tell how this group is interconnected in its efforts to manipulate us into believing such a simple concept. That’s the double-edge.
But an edge which could cut them to shreds is a simple question prompted by all that maddening detail: ‘You want us to ignore skeptic scientists based on a guilt-by-association accusation supported by an out-of-context phrase from an unseen coal industry PR campaign memo?!’”
