Bullfrog
2008-07-07 12:45:19
What interests me is how papers that support Global Warming theory are published in their respective scientific communities. The purpose of peer review is to present your theories and research into a “hostile environment” where other scientists assume your theory to be incorrect, and analyze the accompanying research to see if it changes their mind. Does this happen for GW research, or are papers published by a group of GW “Good Ol’ Boy” scientists who are already bias? Also intriguing are the 30,000+ scientists who insist GW theory is bogus. Why are they being ignored?
