Sorry Boris, but I AM an environmental chemist and the ten years of global COOLING is not NEGLIGABLE, nor can it be dispensed as a random ‘chaos’ effect. In chemistry we use the term entropy. Look it up. And your familiarity with Dr. Tim Ball doesn’t denigrate his arguments – I notice you avoided that course of discussion ENTIRELY.
Now as to the discussion of accuracy/precision of the models
Here’s a little basic chemistry. The cooling effect is an open chemical system equilibrating. Or maybe you prefer it stated in the words of Sir Issac Newton (a person with whom climatologists might do well to remember) – every force has an equal but opposite force. AGW omits entirely the natural corrections that occur with changes in temperature in the earth’s crust.
The idea currently being promoted that earthquakes are more frequent as a result of global warming completely ignore the science of geology, which is habitual by AGW’ers.
So sure, those who promote dramatic antropogenic causation global temperature changes frequently argue that climatologists are the sole scientists who are able to critique their theories. The primary reason is because they live in a vacuum relative to all the other sciences. Buffet chemistry and physics – selective use of chemical and physical principles – is a hallmark of this bogus claim.
Ignore that ten years of cooling – it doesn’t count. Uh – sure.
