“However, I do not think James or any other man would have suffered psychological harm under the circumstances described.”
Translation: Lie back and enjoy it. What you don’t understand is that your evaluation or assessment of the harm is neither here nor there. Period. the law in most places calls this kind of behavior rape. Period. Getting a male judge and a male jury to understand that may be another matter; it is likely that female judge would not have the same problem.
Fred, in Lea’s defense, as she pointed out, it is men on this thread who are dishing out the real venom. It some form of pussy-whipped imitation of masculinity. Women like Mary and Lea are merely callous; I don’t what your expectations of women are, but it is not so strange for either a man or women to have only a clinical interest in what happens to a stranger.
Lea wonders why there is so much anger at women under the surface in this thread. It is simple – the system so obviously priveleges women both as victims and perpetrators.
