To: pch1013
Who do you think you are being sarcastic? You surely understand that ultraconservatives are a mentally inferior species and will find your layered prose to be confusing. I personally get a kick out of watching them perform mutual fellatio on their own ignorance.
Don’t you just love it, watching people get so absurdly worked up over concepts that are so logical? The ironic thing is that the movie was never made with the intention to promote a political agenda. The film was originally written several years ago well before the climate crisis was on the public domain. But even if the story came from a discussion that Greenpeace and Amnesty International reps had while sharing a joint and dancing naked in a forest, how could it possibly be a bad thing?
Here’s a hypothetical that might explain this better to the lesser beings on this page:
If there is a crack in the side of a fish tank growing due to the wrestling of two large fish, shouldn’t the fish stop wrestling? Moreover, shouldn’t these fish then tell their children not to wrestle? Dispute the danger of the crack all you want, but nothing bad can be said about not wrestling. See, if the fish continue to wrestle then their tank may or may not break, but if they decide not to wrestle, their safety is a guarantee.
