The main article is interesting, as opposed to the majority of crap that is poured out in this comments section.
What “crap” would that be? Oh, that’s right, you never actually get around to stating which of the FACTS presented in the comments are incorrect. Instead, your assertion that Islam is no threat to Western Civilization is based on the earth-shattering experience of having witnessed people holding hands at a soccer match…and friendly neighborhood grocers.
You guys who say that there´s no difference between jihadists and terrorists…
What – pray tell – is the difference?
…and that all muslims actually seek for world domination
Please point out where anyone said that? And while you’re answering that, please grace us with your answers to these:
Were all Greeks soldiers and fighters?
Were all Romans soldiers and fighters?
Were all Mongols soldiers and fighters?
Were all Persians soldiers and fighters?
Were all Ottomans soldiers and fighters?
Were all the Spanish soldiers and fighters?
Were all British soldiers and fighters?
Were all the Nazis soldiers and fighters?
Were all the Japanese soldiers and fighters?
Were all the Soviets soldiers and fighters?
And yet, weren’t all of them – on one level or another – pre-occupied with imperial conquest?
It IS dangerous if the view that is presented in this comment section, among (presumably) bright and concious people, is becoming widespread in the population.
Telling hard truths is always dangerous…especially in a civilization that’s been rotted through with the mental disease of Marxism. But in the end, ignoring the truth is far more dangerous.
If everyone believes that the friendly turkish guy who runs the liqourstore on the corner, is infact a terrorist who is determined to take over your country, our society is on a wrong path.
Again, you’re making up things out of whole cloth. Where did anyone say this?
For help with this propensity of yours to simply reframe a topic in terms that allow you to refute it, I suggest googling “Straw man argument”. You may find it enlightening.
And it´s quite disturbing to find that some of you actually believe that all other countries than France and Germany are gonna “fall” and “disintegrate” to muslims……I´m sorry, but that silly rethoric sounds pretty bad in my ears.
Oh yeah? How does this sound in your ears?
2.1 children per woman is the number needed to maintain a steady population. Here are the birth rates for several European countries:
Ireland: 1.99
France: 1.90
Norway: 1.81
Sweden 1.75
UK: 1.74
Netherlands: 1.73
Germany: 1.37
Italy: 1.33
Spain: 1.32
Greece: 1.29
NONE are meeting replacement levels. And the average across the EU is 1.5. And for Muslims? 3.6
Do the math.
In 2008, Muslims comprise about 5% of Europe’s population…by 2020, that figure will be 10%…by 2050, approaching 20%.
But the birth rate disparity isn’t the only thing you Europeans should be worried about. You need to also consider the age demographics that will become more and more pronounced amongst the native vs. Muslim populations: IOW, native Europeans will be getting older and older whilst the Muslim population will be getting younger.
Let’s see: old populations of liberal pacifists sharing ground with young populations of increasingly radicalizing Muslims.
Again, do the math.
I suggest that any of you who hold such views should come over here and see for yourself. I´m sorry. It´s not gonna happen. Not now, not in a million years.
What a perfect illustration of the ignorant, arrogance of the Left.
Here’s a tip: find a current map of the world. Then find a map of the world as it existed in 1900…then one from 1800…then one from 1700…and so on and so on.
Notice anything?
