krispos42:
You said Wilson brought unwelcome information, when the reality is he confirmed the Bush administration’s position that Iraq tried to buy uranium from Niger. Why didn’t you know this? Why weren’t you familiar with the Phase I report of the SSCI?
No amount of smug verbal diarrhea from you can obscure that fact. You were dead wrong, and proven to be dead wrong. Either you’re ignorant or a liar.
You can amuse yourself all you want with what you see as your own rhetorical brilliance; the notion that Wilson refuted the Bush administration’s claims is a flat-out lie.
And everybody her knows that Richard Armitage was the leaker of Plame’s identity. Armitage himself has admitted it.
If you had truth on your side, you wouldn’t have to lie.
Your hero Wilson is a real piece of work. Page 45 of the SSCI’s report on Iraq pre-war intelligence contains the following paragraph:
“The former ambassador also told Committee staff that he was the source of a Washington Post article (‘CIA Did Not Share Doubt on Iraq Data; Bush Used Report of Uranium Bid,’ June 12, 2003) which said, ‘among the Envoy’s conclusions was that the documents may have been forged because “the dates were wrong and the names were wrong.’” Committee staff asked how the former ambassador could have come to the conclusion that the ‘dates were wrong and the names were wrong’ when he had never seen the CIA reports and had no knowledge of what names and dates were in the reports. The former ambassador said that he may have ‘misspoken’ to the reporter when he said he concluded the documents were ‘forged.’”
“Misspoken.” Another sickening liar with no morals whatsoever.
Some of us actually care about our country and aren’t willing to embrace liars and seditious opportunists just because of political expediency.
