You Puritannical Americans have a little petit morte every time some celebrity’s sexual indiscretions are aired. So sex-obsessed and sexually repressed, not to speak of culturally deprived! What transpired between him and the young lady is between them and none of your business. Why do you obsess over such frivolty when you have such a great artist to appreciate? Where is your cultural appreciation you Philistines!”
IMBECILE. SHE WAS DRUGGED AND SAID “NO”. Double, triple, criminal-minded imbecile. (Or pervert). What are you–a troll?
God–I suppose it’s foolish to ask (even if you ARE a troll on this site riling people up) whether or not there are more of you.
And for the record, those of you associating this with being “liberal” are almost as bad, and at least as foolish. I guess all the womens’ votes for Democrats is just nonsensical and has nothing to do with the fact that that Democrats and “liberals” are typically crusading for in women’s rights against violence (including the funding and legal protection of women and children)…and among their many foes are “traditionalists,” conservatives, and the type of people who think a woman “asks for it” if she is drunk or scantily clad.
Be it Republicans comparing birth control (not abortion…IUDS, the Pill, BIRTH CONTROL) to murder to moral relativists who are repugnant enough to call what happened between Geimer and Polasnki “sex” (NOT SEX…RAPE)….you’re BOTH a problem.
And how ironic that the same men of “family values” in Washington are such potent hypocrites in their personal lives…
This is not about being “liberal” or Democrat (how dare you people). Those who rationalize what Polanski did are IDIOTS you either haven’t bothered to learn the details of the case, or can’t be bothered with the definition of “consent.”
A woman can be falling down drunk and naked on a bed–if a man rapes her, it is HIS fault, HIS decision.
The U.S. can be puritanical, but this is not one of those instances
