Flashlighter
2008-06-18 07:47:39
Laughable.
Saying we shouldn’t invade in 2002 and then saying we shouldn’t pull out in 2004 somehow represents a change in position? How? It’s not a change, a pivot or a shift. And all the other supposed changes in his position have to do with tone and word choice – never with any actual policy or strategy.
In other words, the original premise is completely flawed before we get to your Rezko hallucination.
Would somebody please make a cogent reality-based argument for why we shouldn’t vote for Obama?
